6.1 sec in total
476 ms
5.2 sec
408 ms
Welcome to glimsol.com homepage info - get ready to check Glimsol best content for Philippines right away, or after learning these important things about glimsol.com
Visit glimsol.comWe analyzed Glimsol.com page load time and found that the first response time was 476 ms and then it took 5.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
glimsol.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.6 s
32/100
10%
Value7.0 s
6/100
25%
Value5.2 s
61/100
10%
Value560 ms
53/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value9.1 s
33/100
10%
476 ms
376 ms
86 ms
91 ms
89 ms
Our browser made a total of 94 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 66% of them (62 requests) were addressed to the original Glimsol.com, 27% (25 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 3% (3 requests) were made to Scontent.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.8 sec) relates to the external source External.xx.fbcdn.net.
Page size can be reduced by 273.1 kB (28%)
971.4 kB
698.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Glimsol.com main page is 971.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 850.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 23.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.6 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 23.4 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 186.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Glimsol needs image optimization as it can save up to 186.6 kB or 22% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 34 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 63.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Glimsol.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 63.0 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 52 (57%)
92
40
The browser has sent 92 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Glimsol. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 35 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
glimsol.com
476 ms
DD_roundies.js
376 ms
node.css
86 ms
defaults.css
91 ms
system.css
89 ms
system-menus.css
91 ms
user.css
112 ms
content-module.css
168 ms
filefield.css
176 ms
simplenews.css
173 ms
uc_attribute.css
176 ms
uc_order.css
186 ms
uc_product.css
246 ms
uc_store.css
250 ms
views.css
272 ms
html-reset.css
286 ms
wireframes.css
260 ms
layout-fixed.css
318 ms
page-backgrounds.css
320 ms
tabs.css
332 ms
messages.css
342 ms
pages.css
356 ms
block-editing.css
389 ms
blocks.css
392 ms
navigation.css
404 ms
panels-styles.css
414 ms
views-styles.css
433 ms
nodes.css
439 ms
comments.css
459 ms
forms.css
462 ms
fields.css
475 ms
ga.js
59 ms
bodyGradientBG.png
81 ms
background-globe.jpg
145 ms
glimsol_logo.png
114 ms
tag.png
87 ms
nav2.png
80 ms
nav_separator.png
78 ms
banner-home.png
295 ms
bg1.jpg
185 ms
arrow.png
150 ms
website-design-icon.png
156 ms
website-development-icon.png
186 ms
glimsol-web-maintenance-icon.png
215 ms
web-administration-icon.jpg
222 ms
web-publishing-icon.jpg
228 ms
google-adwords-management-icon.png
254 ms
seo-icon.jpg
257 ms
web-hosting-icon.jpg
286 ms
software-testing-icon.jpg
293 ms
proofreading-icon.jpg
298 ms
glimsol-google-adwords.png
325 ms
glimsol-seo-basic.png
356 ms
blockbg.png
365 ms
send%20message.png
441 ms
Civic_website_Thumb_0.jpg
476 ms
El_Toro_Pharmacy_Diabetes_Center_%26_Medical_Supplies_website_Thumb_0.jpg
503 ms
Lawi.jpg
502 ms
NovoEnglish.jpg
532 ms
footer_bg.png
436 ms
footer_separator.png
509 ms
footerlogo.png
510 ms
likebox.php
429 ms
__utm.gif
13 ms
V89xIM8XrVh.css
281 ms
mKIPuHvlbBA.css
349 ms
bVRH4F6MjT7.css
417 ms
UErljrZIeWg.css
573 ms
3PXshBSsmpj.css
550 ms
6bIl72b-rkY.js
617 ms
TkV0upu1GVq.js
616 ms
mn6tHWuLI-Y.js
484 ms
x8BMxYCqTb9.js
484 ms
QKy94bWvcbp.js
600 ms
5paioeCYCa7.js
600 ms
wRXOQ26LQ1k.js
682 ms
UMeIUxuSxxa.js
822 ms
50Trs1RKgUY.js
663 ms
print.css
72 ms
10401419_832948243390752_5796297823580971410_n.jpg
374 ms
safe_image.php
2817 ms
10516768_832949116723998_3923095591104620773_n.jpg
426 ms
425469_532013966817516_1427732095_n.png
788 ms
wL6VQj7Ab77.png
78 ms
s7jcwEQH7Sx.png
77 ms
mbF8ssTVP_5.png
76 ms
Fe6g47SXw-8.png
76 ms
L5AOQ9vzKfo.png
75 ms
oULnqcel5Nm.png
77 ms
q2ibvFgTxmh.png
149 ms
A2JLtDOGyCJ.png
149 ms
pimRBh7B6ER.png
149 ms
Fy3hs8lKW0M.png
148 ms
VXcANLwwL5J.js
69 ms
glimsol.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
glimsol.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
glimsol.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Glimsol.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Glimsol.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
glimsol.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Glimsol. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: