8.3 sec in total
2.6 sec
4.6 sec
1.1 sec
Click here to check amazing Go Portfolio content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about go-portfolio.com
Visit go-portfolio.comWe analyzed Go-portfolio.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.6 sec and then it took 5.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
go-portfolio.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.4 s
70/100
10%
Value9.9 s
0/100
25%
Value6.3 s
42/100
10%
Value1,240 ms
19/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value9.3 s
31/100
10%
2620 ms
75 ms
75 ms
73 ms
84 ms
Our browser made a total of 111 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (105 requests) were addressed to the original Go-portfolio.com, 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Go-pricing.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Go-portfolio.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.8 MB (56%)
3.2 MB
1.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Go-portfolio.com main page is 3.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 92.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 92.0 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 15.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Go Portfolio images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 546.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 546.0 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.2 MB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Go-portfolio.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.2 MB or 90% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 57 (53%)
107
50
The browser has sent 107 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Go Portfolio. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
go-portfolio.com
2620 ms
webfont.js
75 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
75 ms
styles.css
73 ms
magnific-popup.css
84 ms
go_portfolio_styles.css
84 ms
go_pricing_styles.css
84 ms
settings.css
97 ms
select2.css
99 ms
style.css
101 ms
js_composer.css
186 ms
shortcodes.css
136 ms
woocommerce.css
125 ms
responsive.css
128 ms
jquery.js
155 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
153 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
179 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
171 ms
add-to-cart.min.js
180 ms
woocommerce-add-to-cart.js
237 ms
style.css
145 ms
css
34 ms
jquery.form.min.js
79 ms
scripts.js
79 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
80 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
79 ms
jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.1-packed.js
175 ms
jquery.touchSwipe.min.js
135 ms
go_portfolio_scripts.js
172 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
172 ms
woocommerce.min.js
173 ms
jquery.cookie.min.js
175 ms
cart-fragments.min.js
175 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
176 ms
waypoints.min.js
177 ms
waypoints-sticky.min.js
177 ms
prettyPhoto.js
176 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
187 ms
functions.js
186 ms
flexslider.min.js
186 ms
smoothscroll.js
188 ms
comment-reply.min.js
189 ms
wp-embed.min.js
186 ms
js_composer_front.js
190 ms
analytics.js
59 ms
yes1.png
137 ms
go_logo.png
96 ms
go_logo_white.png
99 ms
go_logo@2x.png
97 ms
go_logo_white@2x.png
97 ms
sitesanimation.jpg
608 ms
about_1.png
99 ms
about_2.png
100 ms
about_3.png
101 ms
icon_prev.png
101 ms
icon_next.png
102 ms
icon_video.png
104 ms
vid1.jpg
167 ms
vid2.jpg
168 ms
vid3.jpg
115 ms
vid4.jpg
165 ms
vid5.jpg
165 ms
vid6.jpg
598 ms
mobile.png
168 ms
mobile@2x.png
600 ms
yes@2x.png
112 ms
qr.png
596 ms
f1.png
596 ms
f1@2x.png
597 ms
f2.png
597 ms
f2@2x.png
598 ms
f3.png
596 ms
f3@2x.png
1646 ms
f4.png
1645 ms
f4@2x.png
1642 ms
f5.png
1632 ms
f5@2x.png
876 ms
f6.png
1634 ms
f6@2x.png
875 ms
f7.png
891 ms
f7@2x.png
918 ms
f18.png
945 ms
collect
22 ms
f18@2x.png
908 ms
f9.png
934 ms
f9@2x.png
961 ms
f10.png
988 ms
f10@2x.png
1015 ms
f11.png
1041 ms
f11@2x.png
1068 ms
f20.png
1096 ms
f20@2x.png
1124 ms
new.png
1150 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1252 ms
Simple-Line-Icons.woff
1306 ms
icomoon.ttf
1361 ms
new@2x.png
1415 ms
hot.png
1441 ms
hot@2x.png
1467 ms
head_1.png
1065 ms
head_1@2x.png
1107 ms
head_2.png
1106 ms
head_2@2x.png
1167 ms
head_3.png
1109 ms
head_3@2x.png
1176 ms
head_4.png
1114 ms
head_4@2x.png
1209 ms
head_5.png
1133 ms
head_5@2x.png
848 ms
go_white.png
860 ms
go_white@2x.png
857 ms
go-portfolio.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
go-portfolio.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
go-portfolio.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Go-portfolio.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Go-portfolio.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
go-portfolio.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Go Portfolio. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: