27.2 sec in total
957 ms
13.4 sec
12.9 sec
Welcome to goingup.com homepage info - get ready to check Goingup best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about goingup.com
Free web tracker, live chat, top bar, heat maps, visitor tracking, SEO and so much more. Everything your website needs to engage, retain and attract traffic. Start GoingUp - Free!
Visit goingup.comWe analyzed Goingup.com page load time and found that the first response time was 957 ms and then it took 26.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster.
goingup.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value8.9 s
0/100
10%
Value12.1 s
0/100
25%
Value24.3 s
0/100
10%
Value13,630 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.14
79/100
15%
Value26.6 s
0/100
10%
957 ms
341 ms
291 ms
335 ms
334 ms
Our browser made a total of 73 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 96% of them (70 requests) were addressed to the original Goingup.com, 4% (3 requests) were made to Counter.goingup.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.8 sec) relates to the external source Counter.goingup.com.
Page size can be reduced by 821.6 kB (28%)
2.9 MB
2.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Goingup.com main page is 2.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 24.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 10.9 kB, which is 37% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 24.5 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 71.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Goingup images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 683.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 683.8 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 42.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Goingup.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 42.0 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (51%)
70
34
The browser has sent 70 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Goingup. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
goingup.com
957 ms
style.css
341 ms
header.css
291 ms
content.css
335 ms
footer.css
334 ms
main.css
332 ms
index.css
349 ms
jquery.min.js
360 ms
goingup.js
347 ms
options.js
338 ms
main.js
329 ms
hoverIntent.js
311 ms
superfish.js
745 ms
header.js
580 ms
jquery-ui-1.8.8.min.js
678 ms
jquery.innerfade.js
661 ms
index.js
661 ms
swfobject.js
637 ms
json2.js
651 ms
bodybg.gif
550 ms
bodybgfooter.png
1415 ms
headerbg.png
1414 ms
logo.png
1415 ms
mainnavdividers.gif
1491 ms
navtriangle.gif
1481 ms
subnavline.gif
1480 ms
mastheadbg.png
2401 ms
titgoingup.png
1706 ms
Enterurlbg.png
1511 ms
btn-join-now.png
1500 ms
btn-free-signup-now.png
1477 ms
bkg-middle.png
1477 ms
bkg-repeat.png
1477 ms
bigtitbg.gif
1477 ms
bigtit.png
1678 ms
bigtit2.png
1658 ms
bigtit3.png
1679 ms
bigtit4.png
1833 ms
bigtit5.png
1645 ms
shelfb.gif
1832 ms
shelft.gif
1865 ms
bubble.png
1871 ms
chart.png
2014 ms
lws.png
1995 ms
analyzer.png
1996 ms
titsa.png
1997 ms
seo.png
2045 ms
titseo.png
2046 ms
btn-get-in-touch.png
2047 ms
btn-signup-now.png
2247 ms
tollfree.png
2238 ms
waalogo.jpg
2236 ms
creat_shop.gif
2268 ms
calibri.ttf
1653 ms
calibrib.ttf
1378 ms
free-tools-button.jpg
320 ms
icon-webstats-live.png
479 ms
icon-site-analyzer.png
287 ms
icon-page-rank-badges.png
286 ms
icon-seo-optimizer.png
286 ms
icon-website-thumbnails.png
285 ms
icon-bulk-domain-analyzer.png
285 ms
icon-tag-clouds.png
390 ms
icon-link-site-diagnostics.png
325 ms
visitor-maps.png
325 ms
icon-heat-maps.png
325 ms
footer_bg5.png
324 ms
webanalytics.png
399 ms
tracker.js
4798 ms
tracker.jquery.js
1047 ms
clickheat.js
64 ms
news.html
680 ms
is_logedin
601 ms
goingup.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
goingup.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
goingup.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
N/A
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Goingup.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Goingup.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
goingup.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Goingup. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: