2.4 sec in total
341 ms
1.6 sec
461 ms
Visit goldsheff.com now to see the best up-to-date Goldsheff content for Pakistan and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about goldsheff.com
Visit goldsheff.comWe analyzed Goldsheff.com page load time and found that the first response time was 341 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
goldsheff.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.4 s
70/100
10%
Value2.8 s
82/100
25%
Value2.4 s
98/100
10%
Value40 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.192
64/100
15%
Value3.0 s
96/100
10%
341 ms
119 ms
172 ms
138 ms
171 ms
Our browser made a total of 39 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (37 requests) were addressed to the original Goldsheff.com, 5% (2 requests) were made to X.translateth.is. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Goldsheff.com.
Page size can be reduced by 275.4 kB (10%)
2.8 MB
2.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Goldsheff.com main page is 2.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 27.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 7.7 kB, which is 23% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 27.9 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 180.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Goldsheff images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 63.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 63.0 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Goldsheff.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 4.4 kB or 57% of the original size.
We found no issues to fix!
38
38
The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Goldsheff. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.
goldsheff.com
341 ms
mootools.js
119 ms
jd.gallery.js
172 ms
jd.gallery.css
138 ms
style.css
171 ms
style.css
169 ms
translate-this.js
10 ms
header.png
309 ms
menubg.gif
136 ms
separator.gif
121 ms
ApiMore.jpg
305 ms
Bonium.jpg
319 ms
CaZe.jpg
320 ms
Centural%20Gold.jpg
443 ms
bg.jpg
242 ms
ApiMore-Syrup.jpg
331 ms
ApiMore-Tablet.jpg
375 ms
Bonium-Caplet.jpg
376 ms
Bonium-Syrup.jpg
403 ms
CaZe-Caplet.jpg
419 ms
CaZe-Syrup.jpg
428 ms
Centural%20Gold%20Caplet.jpg
439 ms
Cofse%20Plus%20Syrup.jpg
441 ms
Ferochel-Syrup.jpg
468 ms
Ferochel-Tablet.jpg
498 ms
Livogard-Caplet.jpg
497 ms
Livogard-Syrup.jpg
517 ms
Icon1.JPG
934 ms
icon4.JPG
918 ms
icon2.JPG
1014 ms
pic-1.jpg
567 ms
MD%20Pic.jpg
601 ms
menubg_h.gif
590 ms
twitter-bird-icon.png
652 ms
facebook-icon.png
690 ms
google-icon.png
688 ms
linkedin-icon.png
717 ms
bg.gif
786 ms
tt-btn1.png
6 ms
goldsheff.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
goldsheff.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
goldsheff.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
N/A
ISO-8859-1
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Goldsheff.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Goldsheff.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
goldsheff.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Goldsheff. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: