3.2 sec in total
376 ms
2.5 sec
312 ms
Click here to check amazing Golf Vergleich content for Germany. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about golf-vergleich.de
Für Sie getestet: Vollmitgliedschaften, Fernmitgliedschaften, Golfreisen und mehr. Unser Golf-Vergleich verrät Ihnen, wo Sie 2023 preiswert golfen können!
Visit golf-vergleich.deWe analyzed Golf-vergleich.de page load time and found that the first response time was 376 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
golf-vergleich.de performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.6 s
0/100
10%
Value12.6 s
0/100
25%
Value9.6 s
11/100
10%
Value670 ms
45/100
30%
Value0.242
51/100
15%
Value13.5 s
11/100
10%
376 ms
589 ms
113 ms
332 ms
215 ms
Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 72% of them (38 requests) were addressed to the original Golf-vergleich.de, 9% (5 requests) were made to S7.addthis.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (750 ms) belongs to the original domain Golf-vergleich.de.
Page size can be reduced by 438.6 kB (54%)
815.2 kB
376.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Golf-vergleich.de main page is 815.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 422.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 24.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 24.2 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 20.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Golf Vergleich images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 276.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 276.4 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 117.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Golf-vergleich.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 117.5 kB or 72% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (14%)
51
44
The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Golf Vergleich. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
golf-vergleich.de
376 ms
www.golf-vergleich.de
589 ms
golfstyle_1345030143.css
113 ms
jquery-1.4.2.min.js
332 ms
prettyPhoto.css
215 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
219 ms
addthis_widget.php
14 ms
background-wrapper.gif
137 ms
titel-logo.gif
136 ms
Golfschl%C3%A4ger.jpg
438 ms
presse.jpg
232 ms
video-1-2.jpg
319 ms
thumb_news.jpg
232 ms
google-toolbar.gif
232 ms
dgv_ausweis_2015gedreht80x80.jpg
328 ms
suche-mitgliedschaft.-w80-h80-p0-F-S1.jpg
340 ms
test-alternativ-mitgliedschaft.-w80-h80-p0-F-S1.jpg
351 ms
test-greenfeekarten.-w80-h80-p0-F-S1.jpg
352 ms
test-golfreisen.-w80-h80-p0-F-S1.jpg
427 ms
test-platzreife.-w80-h80-p0-F-S1.jpg
433 ms
test-proshop.-w80-h80-p0-F-S1.jpg
449 ms
test-golfzubehoer.-w80-h80-p0-F-S1.jpg
460 ms
test-golfbuch.-w80-h80-p0-F-S1.jpg
466 ms
test-golfsimulator.-w80-h80-p0-F-S1.jpg
535 ms
ratgeber.-w80-h80-p0-F-S1.jpg
538 ms
test-golffilme.-w80-h80-p0-F-S1.jpg
542 ms
test-lagerverkauf.-w80-h80-p0-F-S1.jpg
553 ms
minilogo-wikipedia.gif
564 ms
minilogo-golfde.gif
571 ms
all.js
129 ms
titel-background.gif
630 ms
titel-schrift.gif
641 ms
menu-background.gif
642 ms
menu-tests.gif
649 ms
arrow.gif
659 ms
menu-spielgebuhr.gif
667 ms
menu-tests2.gif
740 ms
menu-services.gif
750 ms
core201.js
33 ms
analytics.js
15 ms
sprite.png
692 ms
loader.gif
701 ms
collect
49 ms
widget020.top.svg.css
39 ms
150 ms
xd_arbiter.php
82 ms
xd_arbiter.php
137 ms
menu174.js
19 ms
sh200.html
16 ms
120lo.json
21 ms
like.php
118 ms
qeKvIRsJabD.js
145 ms
LVx-xkvaJ0b.png
155 ms
golf-vergleich.de accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
golf-vergleich.de best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
golf-vergleich.de SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
DE
DE
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Golf-vergleich.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Golf-vergleich.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
golf-vergleich.de
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Golf Vergleich. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: