Report Summary

  • 53

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    71% of other websites

  • 76

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 43% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 79

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    40% of websites

goodwatercap.com

Goodwater Home - Goodwater

Page Load Speed

2.2 sec in total

First Response

364 ms

Resources Loaded

1.6 sec

Page Rendered

232 ms

goodwatercap.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Goodwater Cap content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about goodwatercap.com

Goodwater Capital

Visit goodwatercap.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Goodwatercap.com page load time and found that the first response time was 364 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

goodwatercap.com performance score

53

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

23/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.6 s

4/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.0 s

46/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value240 ms

85/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.006

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.3 s

50/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.goodwatercap.com

364 ms

5awx6pwn0Hi4fVD8FomL90gjvtxIyGVj-V-uYv0SZSXfelqffFHN4UJLFRbh52jhWD9XFRFKwDqaZQsKw24KZcjt5Q8qFQSkjsT8iaiaOcizdhsajWs8ScFySfoRdhXCZhNzZYiyiemkjhB3OcFzdPUCdhFydeyzSabCiYiudPuq-c80O1FUiABkZWF3jAF8OcFzdP37O1saiAXlZeTTdKoDSWmyScmDSeBRZPoRdhXKfAZuiYmkjPu3ifJeZWmkdagyH6qJy89bMg62JMJ7fbK2msMMeMX6MKG4fJsmIMMjgfMfH6qJym9bMg65JMJ7fbRxmgMMeM96MKG4fJgmIMMj2kMfH6qJ6m9bMg6YJMJ7fbKfmsMMegI6MKG4fJimIMMjffMfH6qJKB9bMg6PJMJ7fbKTpsMgeMw6MKGHf55eMsMgeMX6MKG4fHToIMIjgfMfH6GJoJjgIMIj2KMfH6qJ7YqbMs6YJMJ7f6R8y6IbMs6sJMHbMiL7N_JB.js

62 ms

54 ms

www.goodwatercap.com

119 ms

common-ed8771b6a3d84eb7699e-min.js

51 ms

Our browser made a total of 30 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 10% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Goodwatercap.com, 60% (18 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net and 13% (4 requests) were made to Static1.squarespace.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (410 ms) relates to the external source Use.typekit.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 33.6 kB (7%)

Content Size

488.3 kB

After Optimization

454.6 kB

In fact, the total size of Goodwatercap.com main page is 488.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 444.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 30.4 kB

  • Original 42.1 kB
  • After minification 39.3 kB
  • After compression 11.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 30.4 kB or 72% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 2.6 kB

  • Original 444.6 kB
  • After minification 442.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Goodwater Cap images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-43%

Potential reduce by 648 B

  • Original 1.5 kB
  • After minification 1.5 kB
  • After compression 869 B

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 648 B or 43% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (31%)

Requests Now

13

After Optimization

9

The browser has sent 13 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Goodwater Cap. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

goodwatercap.com accessibility score

76

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

High

[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

goodwatercap.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

goodwatercap.com SEO score

79

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Goodwatercap.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Goodwatercap.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Goodwater Cap. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: