3.5 sec in total
635 ms
2.8 sec
94 ms
Visit googlefight.com now to see the best up-to-date Google Fight content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about googlefight.com
Type 2 keywords and click on the 'Fight !' button. The winner is the one which gets best visibility on Google.
Visit googlefight.comWe analyzed Googlefight.com page load time and found that the first response time was 635 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
googlefight.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.2 s
8/100
10%
Value7.9 s
3/100
25%
Value11.5 s
5/100
10%
Value27,590 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.4
25/100
15%
Value39.1 s
0/100
10%
635 ms
665 ms
132 ms
257 ms
6 ms
Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 35% of them (26 requests) were addressed to the original Googlefight.com, 9% (7 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (665 ms) belongs to the original domain Googlefight.com.
Page size can be reduced by 386.7 kB (56%)
691.8 kB
305.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Googlefight.com main page is 691.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 411.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 12.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 12.1 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 55.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Google Fight needs image optimization as it can save up to 55.1 kB or 34% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 236.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 236.2 kB or 57% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 83.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Googlefight.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 83.3 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 42 (64%)
66
24
The browser has sent 66 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Google Fight. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
googlefight.com
635 ms
www.googlefight.com
665 ms
bootstrap.min.css
132 ms
googlefight.css
257 ms
font-awesome.min.css
6 ms
jquery-1.11.3.min.js
389 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
266 ms
jssocials.min.js
266 ms
adsbygoogle.js
8 ms
css
22 ms
css
33 ms
google-fight.gif
178 ms
facebook.png
179 ms
twitter.png
179 ms
google+.png
179 ms
earth.png
410 ms
fr.gif
290 ms
en.gif
292 ms
uk.gif
291 ms
de.gif
299 ms
es.gif
294 ms
it.gif
435 ms
be.gif
433 ms
ch.gif
434 ms
sv.gif
434 ms
nl.gif
438 ms
ro.gif
545 ms
gsw.gif
567 ms
br.gif
568 ms
semrush.png
572 ms
ca-pub-4720760633059146.js
73 ms
zrt_lookup.html
69 ms
show_ads_impl.js
81 ms
fql
213 ms
fastbutton
152 ms
share
106 ms
count.json
139 ms
7ajme85aKKx_SCWF59ImQJ_TkvowlIOtbR7ePgFOpF4.ttf
20 ms
0JYI5EzcfImaQg7kk9hBq50EAVxt0G0biEntp43Qt6E.ttf
31 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
18 ms
_Kq7Xa_aavBxPnttrBeaoQ.ttf
54 ms
analytics.js
79 ms
pla
32 ms
collect
34 ms
ads
168 ms
osd.js
12 ms
ads
220 ms
fastbutton
131 ms
87 ms
adj
67 ms
beacon
50 ms
20 ms
0
80 ms
pixel
24 ms
lidar.js
17 ms
sbhK2lTE.js
26 ms
dvbs_src.js
152 ms
verify_selector.js
208 ms
blank.gif
208 ms
pixel
93 ms
pixel
93 ms
cTrvNaRi.html
39 ms
E4WYPs_lNJIuXrWpTsOcc3FIG36RfI0ERc0srw5QW9Y.js
7 ms
sd
5 ms
bst2tv3.html
185 ms
verify.js
59 ms
adServer.bs
61 ms
backup.jpg
19 ms
verifyr.js
35 ms
beacon.js
18 ms
0
133 ms
bg.png
31 ms
adchoices.en.png
59 ms
m
25 ms
googlefight.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0
googlefight.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
googlefight.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Googlefight.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Googlefight.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
googlefight.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Google Fight. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: