1.8 sec in total
435 ms
1.2 sec
166 ms
Visit googlewell.com now to see the best up-to-date Googlewell content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about googlewell.com
United World Foundation
Visit googlewell.comWe analyzed Googlewell.com page load time and found that the first response time was 435 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.
googlewell.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.6 s
94/100
10%
Value1.6 s
99/100
25%
Value2.2 s
99/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value1.6 s
100/100
10%
435 ms
70 ms
77 ms
80 ms
81 ms
Our browser made a total of 45 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (41 requests) were addressed to the original Googlewell.com, 2% (1 request) were made to D31qbv1cthcecs.cloudfront.net and 2% (1 request) were made to D5nxst8fruw4z.cloudfront.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (435 ms) belongs to the original domain Googlewell.com.
Page size can be reduced by 836.4 kB (68%)
1.2 MB
392.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Googlewell.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 695.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 17.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 17.0 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 9.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Googlewell images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 476.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 476.0 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 334.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Googlewell.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 334.3 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (78%)
40
9
The browser has sent 40 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Googlewell. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
googlewell.com
435 ms
calendar.css
70 ms
front.css
77 ms
highslide.css
80 ms
highslide-sitestyles.css
81 ms
rokbox.css
131 ms
menu-296f9540b6fdbc3d0fa92e37d50106a1.css
92 ms
menu-hovers-296f9540b6fdbc3d0fa92e37d50106a1.css
134 ms
grid-responsive.css
137 ms
bootstrap.css
207 ms
master-19aa34798ba8084504915da11e5a26cc.css
221 ms
mediaqueries.css
140 ms
rtl.css
177 ms
thirdparty-k2.css
170 ms
rt_stratos-custom.css
177 ms
extrotips.css
184 ms
mootools-core.js
278 ms
core.js
234 ms
caption.js
233 ms
script.js
234 ms
highslide-full.packed.js
296 ms
easing_equations.js
247 ms
swfobject.js
247 ms
en.js
258 ms
highslide-sitesettings.js
269 ms
mootools-more.js
402 ms
rokbox.js
360 ms
gantry-totop.js
303 ms
selectivizr-min.js
311 ms
belated-png.js
357 ms
browser-engines.js
358 ms
rokmediaqueries.js
363 ms
light-diagonal-strips.png
68 ms
atrk.js
68 ms
logo.png
64 ms
cloudbg6.png
205 ms
Ubuntu-L-webfont.woff
37 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
132 ms
Ubuntu-R-webfont.woff
43 ms
atrk.gif
26 ms
test.png
164 ms
inspectlet.js
8 ms
beveled.png
38 ms
zmout.cur
44 ms
loader.white.gif
41 ms
googlewell.com accessibility score
googlewell.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
googlewell.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Googlewell.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Googlewell.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
googlewell.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Googlewell. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: