Report Summary

  • 54

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    72% of other websites

  • 71

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 37% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

gramsbergen.nl

Gramsbergen.nl

Page Load Speed

9.3 sec in total

First Response

2.7 sec

Resources Loaded

6.1 sec

Page Rendered

423 ms

gramsbergen.nl screenshot

About Website

Welcome to gramsbergen.nl homepage info - get ready to check Gramsbergen best content right away, or after learning these important things about gramsbergen.nl

Visit gramsbergen.nl

Key Findings

We analyzed Gramsbergen.nl page load time and found that the first response time was 2.7 sec and then it took 6.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

gramsbergen.nl performance score

54

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

30/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.2 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.1 s

61/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value280 ms

81/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.066

97/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.0 s

53/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

gramsbergen.nl

2743 ms

ccm.base.css

195 ms

jquery.js

458 ms

ccm.base.js

194 ms

view.css

195 ms

Our browser made a total of 92 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 59% of them (54 requests) were addressed to the original Gramsbergen.nl, 12% (11 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 5% (5 requests) were made to Destentor.nl. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.8 sec) relates to the external source Tarlo.nl.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.4 MB (50%)

Content Size

2.7 MB

After Optimization

1.4 MB

In fact, the total size of Gramsbergen.nl main page is 2.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 73.1 kB

  • Original 85.5 kB
  • After minification 81.1 kB
  • After compression 12.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 73.1 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 193.6 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 958.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Gramsbergen needs image optimization as it can save up to 193.6 kB or 17% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 694.2 kB

  • Original 1.0 MB
  • After minification 983.4 kB
  • After compression 315.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 694.2 kB or 69% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 411.5 kB

  • Original 477.0 kB
  • After minification 402.2 kB
  • After compression 65.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gramsbergen.nl needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 411.5 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 53 (59%)

Requests Now

90

After Optimization

37

The browser has sent 90 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gramsbergen. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 33 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

gramsbergen.nl accessibility score

71

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

gramsbergen.nl best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

gramsbergen.nl SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    NL

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gramsbergen.nl can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Dutch is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Gramsbergen.nl main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Gramsbergen. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: