2.2 sec in total
29 ms
2 sec
251 ms
Welcome to grasshopper.com homepage info - get ready to check Grasshopper best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about grasshopper.com
A virtual phone system can help businesses stay organized as call volume increases. Leverage unlimited users, 24/7 support and more with Grasshopper today!
Visit grasshopper.comWe analyzed Grasshopper.com page load time and found that the first response time was 29 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
grasshopper.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.4 s
37/100
10%
Value9.6 s
0/100
25%
Value6.7 s
36/100
10%
Value1,570 ms
13/100
30%
Value0.378
28/100
15%
Value12.0 s
16/100
10%
29 ms
9 ms
16 ms
194 ms
41 ms
Our browser made a total of 133 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 32% of them (42 requests) were addressed to the original Grasshopper.com, 8% (10 requests) were made to D.adroll.com and 7% (9 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (564 ms) relates to the external source Static.xx.fbcdn.net.
Page size can be reduced by 1.0 MB (53%)
1.9 MB
900.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Grasshopper.com main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 763.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 36.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 36.1 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 38.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Grasshopper images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 472.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 472.7 kB or 62% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 459.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Grasshopper.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 459.4 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 65 (62%)
105
40
The browser has sent 105 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Grasshopper. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
grasshopper.com
29 ms
global.css
9 ms
homepage.css
16 ms
30110262.js
194 ms
mapbox.js
41 ms
mapbox.css
40 ms
jquery.min.js
40 ms
global.js
22 ms
slider.js
21 ms
count.js
36 ms
event
68 ms
54 ms
secure.grasshopper.com
99 ms
logo.png
50 ms
language_flags.png
48 ms
curved.png
49 ms
inc500.png
48 ms
cnn.png
48 ms
fox-biz.png
49 ms
forbes.png
50 ms
wsj.png
50 ms
techcrunch.png
51 ms
carolyn-appleton.png
51 ms
allan-branch.png
50 ms
toll-free-numbers.png
54 ms
800-numbers.png
53 ms
vanity-numbers.png
52 ms
844-numbers.png
53 ms
slider-left.png
54 ms
slider-right.png
53 ms
ghgrow-promo.jpg
92 ms
jump-promo.jpg
56 ms
business-sms.jpg
93 ms
grasshopper_logo.png
55 ms
grasshopper_logo_black.png
55 ms
ProximaNova-Reg-webfont.woff
55 ms
ProximaNova-Light-webfont.woff
91 ms
ProximaNova-Sbold-webfont.woff
92 ms
ProximaNova-Bold-webfont.woff
92 ms
bat.js
87 ms
ga.js
87 ms
80 ms
O1VkAyZdq98
107 ms
icomoon.woff
38 ms
Manwriting-webfont.woff
73 ms
ProximaNova-LightIt-webfont.woff
37 ms
proximanova-regularitalic-webfont.woff
38 ms
grasshopper.com
34 ms
all.js
367 ms
plusone.js
77 ms
widgets.js
21 ms
iframe_api
65 ms
activityi;src=4980326;type=landi0;cat=gh_hp;ord=1;num=1385972453281.2834
90 ms
embed.js
65 ms
graph.facebook.com
140 ms
map.png
45 ms
__utm.gif
36 ms
button.831500944bc3eb7ea5276ccdc3f71d2e.js
74 ms
share
73 ms
www-widgetapi.js
27 ms
18 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
12 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
36 ms
fastbutton
99 ms
hiw1.png
26 ms
hiw2.png
20 ms
postmessageRelay
44 ms
hiw3.png
9 ms
tweet_button.6a78875565a912489e9aef879c881358.en.html
16 ms
O1VkAyZdq98
47 ms
hiw4.png
16 ms
api.js
52 ms
core:rpc:shindig.random:shindig.sha1.js
98 ms
2536007149-postmessagerelay.js
59 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
40 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
45 ms
W5F8_SL0XFawnjxHGsZjJA.ttf
70 ms
www-embed-player-vflZsBgOl.css
49 ms
www-embed-player.js
80 ms
yrK4EqpSRdoujKQmsJoZ5WaLgeULvcWnibQMQSxOOnM.js
61 ms
ad_status.js
34 ms
js
25 ms
jot
123 ms
2UX7WLTfW3W8TclTUvlFyQ.woff
22 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
23 ms
i.js
184 ms
134 ms
xd_arbiter.php
225 ms
xd_arbiter.php
434 ms
roundtrip.js
25 ms
RICTPU6PLNBFPNCPVLVDKM.js
426 ms
js
25 ms
like.php
100 ms
img
18 ms
vpc6VNjRPXV.js
504 ms
LVx-xkvaJ0b.png
564 ms
iframe
28 ms
img
15 ms
img
25 ms
out
20 ms
tr
32 ms
19 ms
23 ms
41 ms
tr
115 ms
tr
100 ms
tr
101 ms
tr
100 ms
out
7 ms
out
6 ms
out
11 ms
out
11 ms
out
16 ms
out
10 ms
out
16 ms
out
16 ms
27 ms
u.php
78 ms
sync
54 ms
adsct
137 ms
pixel
84 ms
32 ms
35 ms
36 ms
44 ms
44 ms
37 ms
41 ms
35 ms
377928.gif
25 ms
sd
24 ms
in
12 ms
tap.php
194 ms
grasshopper.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
grasshopper.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
grasshopper.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Grasshopper.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Grasshopper.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
grasshopper.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Grasshopper. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: