5.3 sec in total
1.5 sec
3.2 sec
553 ms
Visit greatchoice.com now to see the best up-to-date Greatchoice content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about greatchoice.com
Computer Repair in Ocala FL, Remote & onsite IT support for small businesses. Affordable flat rate pricing. HIPAA compliance audit and disaster recovery
Visit greatchoice.comWe analyzed Greatchoice.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.5 sec and then it took 3.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
greatchoice.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.7 s
29/100
10%
Value8.4 s
2/100
25%
Value17.6 s
0/100
10%
Value5,770 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.279
43/100
15%
Value24.5 s
0/100
10%
1534 ms
28 ms
105 ms
103 ms
39 ms
Our browser made a total of 68 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 53% of them (36 requests) were addressed to the original Greatchoice.com, 22% (15 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (5 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Greatchoice.com.
Page size can be reduced by 81.3 kB (5%)
1.5 MB
1.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Greatchoice.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 701.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 43.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 7.3 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 43.4 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 32.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Greatchoice images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 2.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 3.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Greatchoice.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (65%)
51
18
The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Greatchoice. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.greatchoice.com
1534 ms
style.min.css
28 ms
styles.css
105 ms
style.css
103 ms
style.css
39 ms
css
31 ms
style.css
64 ms
css
44 ms
style.css
105 ms
rocket-loader.min.js
41 ms
et-divi-customizer-global-17068235729139.min.css
108 ms
email-decode.min.js
21 ms
css
70 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
87 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
71 ms
index.js
71 ms
callus.js
80 ms
custom.unified.js
78 ms
scripts.js
72 ms
scripts.js
74 ms
common.js
130 ms
wp-embed.min.js
74 ms
easy-table.css
70 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
129 ms
jquery.min.js
16 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
20 ms
analytics.js
89 ms
fbevents.js
142 ms
GreatChoice-Computers-Logo.png
86 ms
booFiz7cR_M
242 ms
maxresdefault.jpg
201 ms
icon_antivirus.png
127 ms
icon_dailyhealth.png
126 ms
icon_backups.png
69 ms
icon_helpdeskv2.png
69 ms
hipaa-complaince.png
126 ms
img_remotesupport.png
125 ms
1Pt_g8LJRfWJmhDAuUsSQamb1W0lwk4S4WjMPrQ.ttf
103 ms
1Pt_g8LJRfWJmhDAuUsSQamb1W0lwk4S4TbMPrQ.ttf
118 ms
1Pt_g8LJRfWJmhDAuUsSQamb1W0lwk4S4Y_LPrQ.ttf
141 ms
modules.ttf
167 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVc.ttf
141 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf
141 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4uaVc.ttf
139 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf
139 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf
126 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk8ZkWV4exQ.ttf
141 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk5hkWV4exQ.ttf
142 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkxhjWV4exQ.ttf
142 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkyFjWV4exQ.ttf
164 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk0ZjWV4exQ.ttf
142 ms
banner2.jpg
194 ms
received_2789649681091427.jpeg
50 ms
bg_section2.jpg
84 ms
bg_footer.jpg
275 ms
collect
49 ms
js
111 ms
www-player.css
8 ms
www-embed-player.js
87 ms
base.js
114 ms
ad_status.js
147 ms
cHoal1GHrde4YWVmtNRS7rfNld6iV6ittWnnuOkThR0.js
117 ms
embed.js
33 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
29 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
32 ms
id
40 ms
Create
110 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
101 ms
greatchoice.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
[lang] attributes do not have a valid value
greatchoice.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
greatchoice.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Greatchoice.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Greatchoice.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
greatchoice.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Greatchoice. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: