1.8 sec in total
104 ms
1.5 sec
196 ms
Visit greatergood.me now to see the best up-to-date Greatergood content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about greatergood.me
With Bitly Enterprise, you can create your own Branded Short Domain, which drives an increase of up to 34% in CTR when compared to bit.ly links.
Visit greatergood.meWe analyzed Greatergood.me page load time and found that the first response time was 104 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
greatergood.me performance score
104 ms
123 ms
149 ms
127 ms
62 ms
Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Greatergood.me, 11% (8 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net and 7% (5 requests) were made to Bitly.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (400 ms) relates to the external source Apis.google.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.4 MB (69%)
2.0 MB
625.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Greatergood.me main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 48.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 10.7 kB, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 48.9 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 13.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Greatergood images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 705.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 705.8 kB or 63% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 654.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Greatergood.me needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 654.7 kB or 91% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 51 (76%)
67
16
The browser has sent 67 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Greatergood. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 36 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
branded-short-domains-powered-by-bitly
104 ms
itempropwp.css
123 ms
styles-blessed1.css
149 ms
styles.css
127 ms
jquery.js
62 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
115 ms
bitly-client.js
147 ms
picturefill.min.js
146 ms
modernizr.custom.min.js
145 ms
mys2uzu.js
245 ms
oct.js
252 ms
conversion.js
144 ms
in.js
134 ms
buttons.js
144 ms
jquery.min.js
214 ms
bootstrap.min.js
142 ms
jquery.backstretch.min.js
141 ms
perfect-scrollbar.min.js
208 ms
perfect-scrollbar.with-mousewheel.min.js
209 ms
jquery.carousel.js
208 ms
conversion_async.js
141 ms
scripts.js
208 ms
forms2.js
209 ms
bitly_form.js
208 ms
iframe_api
204 ms
wp-embed.min.js
118 ms
bitly.com
30 ms
fbevents.js
74 ms
Screen-Shot-2015-08-27-at-3.42.18-PM.png
33 ms
adsct
365 ms
adsct
365 ms
-hUjeXi-QFsGHUpYhdu85DoeXpO2GEx35zYI17tQrf3ffFx8ggMmeMJ6Mk6f5Mb.woff
128 ms
UmN6HmRBu1SbjM8IBN6SZCg8jHpua9uYV2ohMuPK8G3ff5Y8ggMmeMJ6Mk6f5M9.woff
254 ms
A4o34Q4f32imB20sizcC7nuwgPWkuE19FJwgBzmqWzqff5V8ggMmeMJ6Mk6f5MS.woff
324 ms
jIhxcoeSiRtq3ydBiNdmzCQAxrVvUM3wouMvfNskhSvffHHsgsMmeMJ6Mk6f5Mw.woff
360 ms
xpZLtTKBTfirWnJM5s4w6B4Azc3vEzndzQD8_qssMbSffHPsgsMmeMJ6Mk6f5Mb.woff
360 ms
gkXG-lWRRqN5mRrPbz5slnVGS-XX9sJtpzbccZ0a2n9ffH-sgsMmeMJ6Mk6f5Mj.woff
358 ms
analytics.js
337 ms
gtm.js
320 ms
munchkin.js
392 ms
sdk.js
246 ms
widgets.js
121 ms
platform.js
400 ms
secureAnonymousFramework
243 ms
header-logo.png
224 ms
350 ms
trust-logos.png
269 ms
icons-mini.png
207 ms
www-widgetapi.js
225 ms
getForm
296 ms
getAllAppDefault.esi
121 ms
137 ms
130 ms
xd_arbiter.php
66 ms
1003400186.js
233 ms
collect
29 ms
getSegment.php
39 ms
p.gif
219 ms
munchkin.js
60 ms
t.dhj
190 ms
visitWebPage
34 ms
97 ms
XDFrame
109 ms
event
36 ms
t.dhj
81 ms
forms2.min.js
19 ms
hbpix
131 ms
cm
80 ms
x35248
149 ms
s-3271.xgi
12 ms
21 ms
xrefid.xgi
5 ms
25 ms
img;m=11022203137504;cache=
104 ms
greatergood.me SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Greatergood.me can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Greatergood.me main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
greatergood.me
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Greatergood. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: