3.6 sec in total
260 ms
3.1 sec
214 ms
Welcome to grm.net homepage info - get ready to check GRM best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about grm.net
Grand River Mutual (GRM) is a provider of Internet and Phone service with offices in Bethany and Princeton, Missouri and Leon, Iowa.
Visit grm.netWe analyzed Grm.net page load time and found that the first response time was 260 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
grm.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.8 s
57/100
10%
Value13.6 s
0/100
25%
Value9.5 s
12/100
10%
Value480 ms
60/100
30%
Value0.19
64/100
15%
Value13.0 s
13/100
10%
260 ms
834 ms
73 ms
74 ms
74 ms
Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Grm.net, 47% (28 requests) were made to Www2.grm.net and 20% (12 requests) were made to Radiotime-badges.s3.amazonaws.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) relates to the external source Www2.grm.net.
Page size can be reduced by 167.4 kB (19%)
893.2 kB
725.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Grm.net main page is 893.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 631.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 41.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 41.8 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 9.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. GRM images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 67.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 67.3 kB or 45% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 48.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Grm.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 48.6 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (48%)
54
28
The browser has sent 54 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of GRM. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
grm.net
260 ms
www2.grm.net
834 ms
globals.css
73 ms
media-queries.css
74 ms
style.css
74 ms
modernizr-1.7.min.js
607 ms
1109 ms
jquery.min.js
13 ms
175 ms
js
36 ms
yahooWeatherWidget.js
80 ms
94 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
73 ms
analytics.js
50 ms
global-body-background.jpg
181 ms
logo-reserved.png
166 ms
fb.jpg
50 ms
twitter.jpg
52 ms
33.png
51 ms
31.png
166 ms
34.png
165 ms
cse.js
45 ms
GRM_EbillChat_Button-icons.png
155 ms
GRM_EbillChat_Button-icons.png
606 ms
blank.gif
200 ms
collect
140 ms
global-row-1-search-button.png
204 ms
dial.html
277 ms
row-6-facebook-icon.png
163 ms
jsapi
18 ms
grab.png
87 ms
Website_slider_Mar_2016.jpg
163 ms
preloader.gif
89 ms
netins-scholarship-banner-ad-275x169.jpg
153 ms
default+en.css
3 ms
default.css
27 ms
default+en.I.js
9 ms
default.css
45 ms
async-ads.js
50 ms
google_custom_search_watermark.gif
34 ms
small-logo.png
22 ms
search_box_icon.png
20 ms
clear.gif
21 ms
nav_logo114.png
14 ms
tech_home_small_web_banner.jpg
110 ms
rt_dial_min.css
172 ms
rt_dial_min.js
213 ms
Blog-Banner.jpg
76 ms
LocalRadioJson.aspx
175 ms
1.gif
185 ms
speak_icon.png
173 ms
win_icon.png
185 ms
fm_scale.png
184 ms
select_scale.png
199 ms
arrows.png
207 ms
am_off.png
324 ms
fm_on.png
354 ms
go.png
336 ms
s32192s.png
63 ms
grm.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
grm.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
grm.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Grm.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Grm.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
grm.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of GRM. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: