5.5 sec in total
288 ms
5 sec
224 ms
Click here to check amazing Guardian content for Bulgaria. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about guardian.com
Visit guardian.comWe analyzed Guardian.com page load time and found that the first response time was 288 ms and then it took 5.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
guardian.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.7 s
60/100
10%
Value3.9 s
52/100
25%
Value4.5 s
72/100
10%
Value220 ms
87/100
30%
Value0.099
90/100
15%
Value9.4 s
31/100
10%
288 ms
1413 ms
315 ms
357 ms
368 ms
Our browser made a total of 66 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 74% of them (49 requests) were addressed to the original Guardian.com, 14% (9 requests) were made to Google.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Cse.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Guardian.com.
Page size can be reduced by 511.1 kB (21%)
2.4 MB
1.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Guardian.com main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 84.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 14.0 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 84.4 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 91.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Guardian images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 293.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 293.5 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 41.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Guardian.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 41.4 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (43%)
63
36
The browser has sent 63 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Guardian. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
guardian.com
288 ms
www.guardian.com
1413 ms
sitenavigationfunctions.js
315 ms
sitenavigation.js
357 ms
wcm.toggle.js
368 ms
ssajax.js
403 ms
stg_008654.css
368 ms
stg_008329.js
285 ms
style_new.hcst
525 ms
jquery.min.js
74 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
95 ms
gi_006858.js
565 ms
stg_008506.js
576 ms
gi_009923.js
603 ms
dev_005456.js
565 ms
gi_003532.css
563 ms
jsapi
52 ms
GuardianLookAndFeelBottomNavFragNEWCss.css
1163 ms
carouselstyle.css
1165 ms
carouselscript.js
1199 ms
animatedboxcaption.js
1166 ms
web_072128.js
1591 ms
hotjar-50422.js
561 ms
modules-1f5c71aea63f8df71401422ed80fbe5f.js
23 ms
web_072347.jpg
1000 ms
gi_019954.png
433 ms
prd_057180.png
475 ms
gi_019955.png
431 ms
prd_057135.png
474 ms
prd_057136.png
473 ms
stg_029651.jpg
712 ms
pro_009266.jpg
916 ms
pro_009267.jpg
959 ms
pro_056616.jpg
952 ms
pro_055608.jpg
1048 ms
dev_007798.gif
875 ms
web_075406.png
1149 ms
web_075260.jpg
1129 ms
web_072180.jpg
1071 ms
web_072342.jpg
1202 ms
stg_006324.png
1144 ms
cse.js
292 ms
web_072129.css
955 ms
index.htm
982 ms
gi_004277.png
985 ms
gi_020751.png
1062 ms
gi_013806.png
987 ms
gi_013805.png
988 ms
gi_013807.gif
1090 ms
stg_029651.jpg
1131 ms
jsapi
19 ms
default+en.css
3 ms
default.css
20 ms
default+en.I.js
25 ms
default.css
39 ms
async-ads.js
58 ms
google_custom_search_watermark.gif
44 ms
small-logo.png
49 ms
search_box_icon.png
48 ms
nav_logo114.png
49 ms
arrowleft.png
953 ms
arrowright.png
965 ms
stg_031865.png
963 ms
stg_031866.png
1058 ms
visit-data
196 ms
web_072328.png
344 ms
guardian.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
guardian.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
guardian.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Guardian.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Guardian.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
guardian.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Guardian. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: