Tools & Wizards About Us
rewards.goodhousekeeping.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 27

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    47% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

rewards.goodhousekeeping.com

Lifestyle - Relationship Advice, Entertainment, Books and More

Page Load Speed

1 sec in total

First Response

27 ms

Resources Loaded

321 ms

Page Rendered

663 ms

rewards.goodhousekeeping.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Rewards Goodhousekeeping content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about rewards.goodhousekeeping.com

Get the latest lifestyle news from the editors of Good Housekeeping.

Visit rewards.goodhousekeeping.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rewards.goodhousekeeping.com page load time and found that the first response time was 27 ms and then it took 984 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rewards.goodhousekeeping.com performance score

27

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

74/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.3 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.6 s

26/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,280 ms

5/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.005

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value24.5 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rewards.goodhousekeeping.com

27 ms

27 ms

main.css

37 ms

require-2.1.9.min.js

21 ms

Bootstrap.js

37 ms

Our browser made a total of 14 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 7% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Rewards.goodhousekeeping.com, 71% (10 requests) were made to Ghk.h-cdn.co and 14% (2 requests) were made to Nexus.ensighten.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (72 ms) relates to the external source Ghk.h-cdn.co.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (78%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

296.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Rewards.goodhousekeeping.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 683.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 180.7 kB

  • Original 216.8 kB
  • After minification 216.5 kB
  • After compression 36.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 180.7 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-38%

Potential reduce by 367 B

  • Original 974 B
  • After minification 607 B

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Rewards Goodhousekeeping needs image optimization as it can save up to 367 B or 38% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 484.2 kB

  • Original 683.0 kB
  • After minification 683.0 kB
  • After compression 198.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 484.2 kB or 71% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 414.5 kB

  • Original 475.1 kB
  • After minification 471.0 kB
  • After compression 60.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rewards.goodhousekeeping.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 414.5 kB or 87% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (43%)

Requests Now

7

After Optimization

4

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 7 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rewards Goodhousekeeping. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

rewards.goodhousekeeping.com

rewards.goodhousekeeping.com

27 ms

27 ms

main.css

main.css

37 ms

require-2.1.9.min.js

require-2.1.9.min.js

21 ms

Bootstrap.js

Bootstrap.js

37 ms

gh-seal.svg

gh-seal.svg

69 ms

blank.png

blank.png

68 ms

rams.js

rams.js

72 ms

IconFont.woff

IconFont.woff

50 ms

f26faddb-86cc-4477-a253-1e1287684336.woff

f26faddb-86cc-4477-a253-1e1287684336.woff

51 ms

a43fe47f-004d-4b6d-9a72-23de9e08f66e.woff

a43fe47f-004d-4b6d-9a72-23de9e08f66e.woff

51 ms

eb20bf3e-7a5c-4c98-8bc5-f38c1b3dd9f2.woff

eb20bf3e-7a5c-4c98-8bc5-f38c1b3dd9f2.woff

51 ms

c9f28ccf-b57b-42f0-a9b2-069bc432d930.woff

c9f28ccf-b57b-42f0-a9b2-069bc432d930.woff

51 ms

serverComponent.php

serverComponent.php

49 ms

Accessibility Review

rewards.goodhousekeeping.com accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

rewards.goodhousekeeping.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

rewards.goodhousekeeping.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rewards.goodhousekeeping.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Rewards.goodhousekeeping.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

rewards.goodhousekeeping.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rewards Goodhousekeeping. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: