Report Summary

  • 39

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    59% of other websites

  • 78

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 46% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

Page Load Speed

3.4 sec in total

First Response

161 ms

Resources Loaded

2.8 sec

Page Rendered

472 ms

harpsocial.com screenshot

About Website

Visit harpsocial.com now to see the best up-to-date Harpsocial content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about harpsocial.com

A full-service agency providing traditional and digital marketing. We’re located in the Chicago suburbs and serve clients nationwide.

Visit harpsocial.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Harpsocial.com page load time and found that the first response time was 161 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

harpsocial.com performance score

39

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

48/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.0 s

13/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.3 s

19/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value250 ms

85/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.605

10/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.9 s

21/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

harpsocial.com

161 ms

582 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

190 ms

ppibfi_pinterest.css

129 ms

styles.css

131 ms

Our browser made a total of 133 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Harpsocial.com, 45% (60 requests) were made to Harpinteractive.com and 14% (18 requests) were made to Pbs.twimg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (660 ms) relates to the external source Harpinteractive.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 969.0 kB (46%)

Content Size

2.1 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

In fact, the total size of Harpsocial.com main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 912.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 49.0 kB

  • Original 63.5 kB
  • After minification 59.1 kB
  • After compression 14.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 49.0 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 66.9 kB

  • Original 912.8 kB
  • After minification 845.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Harpsocial images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 567.1 kB

  • Original 793.6 kB
  • After minification 674.9 kB
  • After compression 226.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 567.1 kB or 71% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 285.9 kB

  • Original 342.3 kB
  • After minification 312.7 kB
  • After compression 56.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Harpsocial.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 285.9 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 68 (56%)

Requests Now

121

After Optimization

53

The browser has sent 121 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Harpsocial. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 42 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 23 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

harpsocial.com accessibility score

78

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

harpsocial.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

harpsocial.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Harpsocial.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Harpsocial.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Harpsocial. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: