4.6 sec in total
738 ms
2.3 sec
1.6 sec
Welcome to heavy.digital homepage info - get ready to check Heavy best content right away, or after learning these important things about heavy.digital
Visit heavy.digitalWe analyzed Heavy.digital page load time and found that the first response time was 738 ms and then it took 3.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
heavy.digital performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.7 s
30/100
10%
Value8.3 s
2/100
25%
Value27.2 s
0/100
10%
Value30,850 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value42.7 s
0/100
10%
738 ms
79 ms
100 ms
149 ms
151 ms
Our browser made a total of 64 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (49 requests) were addressed to the original Heavy.digital, 16% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (738 ms) belongs to the original domain Heavy.digital.
Page size can be reduced by 78.9 kB (12%)
648.6 kB
569.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Heavy.digital main page is 648.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 358.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 70.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 70.9 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 7.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Heavy images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 111 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 157 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Heavy.digital has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (82%)
50
9
The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Heavy. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
heavy.digital
738 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
79 ms
style.min.css
100 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
149 ms
frontend-legacy.min.css
151 ms
frontend.min.css
130 ms
post-2430.css
113 ms
frontend.min.css
171 ms
all.min.css
148 ms
v4-shims.min.css
200 ms
global.css
166 ms
post-2276.css
228 ms
post-2402.css
198 ms
post-2394.css
202 ms
css
163 ms
fontawesome.min.css
205 ms
solid.min.css
328 ms
brands.min.css
225 ms
v4-shims.min.js
230 ms
js
203 ms
animations.min.css
220 ms
jquery.min.js
225 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
256 ms
jquery.smartmenus.min.js
227 ms
comment-reply.min.js
260 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
248 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
239 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
284 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
277 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
282 ms
hooks.min.js
268 ms
i18n.min.js
285 ms
frontend.min.js
351 ms
waypoints.min.js
410 ms
core.min.js
412 ms
swiper.min.js
409 ms
share-link.min.js
410 ms
dialog.min.js
413 ms
frontend.min.js
407 ms
preloaded-elements-handlers.min.js
388 ms
preloaded-modules.min.js
561 ms
jquery.sticky.min.js
319 ms
Logo-Heavy-Digital-Glyph-300x186.png
250 ms
320393_210914672373730_2059136137_n.jpg
71 ms
HD-Portfolio-GardeningByCuisine-1024x576.jpg
251 ms
WPE-BDG-PartnerProgram-Outline-Member-W-300x260.png
71 ms
Logo-Heavy-Digital-Glyph.png
250 ms
bg_studio-nologo.jpg
235 ms
analytics.js
210 ms
js
204 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aXx-p7K4GLs.woff
347 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aXx-p7K4GLs.woff
430 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aXx-p7K4GLs.woff
512 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw5aXx-p7K4GLs.woff
518 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw5aXx-p7K4GLs.woff
500 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aXx-p7K4GLs.woff
515 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aXx-p7K4GLs.woff
505 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w5aXx-p7K4GLs.woff
498 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w5aXx-p7K4GLs.woff
521 ms
sykr-yRtm7EvTrXNxkv5jfKKyDCAKHDheJERtQ.woff
517 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
336 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
322 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
323 ms
collect
297 ms
heavy.digital accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
heavy.digital best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
heavy.digital SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
LA
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Heavy.digital can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Latin is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Heavy.digital main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
heavy.digital
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Heavy. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: