3.7 sec in total
410 ms
3.1 sec
210 ms
Welcome to highermark.com homepage info - get ready to check HIGHER MARK best content right away, or after learning these important things about highermark.com
Higher Mark Beta/Biothane® Equestrian Horse Tack since 1989 "Setting the Higher Mark" with Custom Sizes, Design & Quality Workmanship.
Visit highermark.comWe analyzed Highermark.com page load time and found that the first response time was 410 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
highermark.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.0 s
10/100
10%
Value5.0 s
27/100
25%
Value6.3 s
41/100
10%
Value80 ms
99/100
30%
Value0.12
84/100
15%
Value6.1 s
63/100
10%
410 ms
132 ms
56 ms
153 ms
160 ms
Our browser made a total of 101 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 63% of them (64 requests) were addressed to the original Highermark.com, 35% (35 requests) were made to Cdn.initial-website.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to 203.sb.mywebsite-editor.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (903 ms) belongs to the original domain Highermark.com.
Page size can be reduced by 2.9 MB (13%)
21.7 MB
18.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Highermark.com main page is 21.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 21.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 75.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 75.8 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.8 MB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, HIGHER MARK needs image optimization as it can save up to 2.8 MB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 23.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 23.7 kB or 23% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Highermark.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.5 kB or 27% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 45 (45%)
100
55
The browser has sent 100 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of HIGHER MARK. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.highermark.com
410 ms
style.css
132 ms
theming.css
56 ms
web.css
153 ms
common,shoppingbasket
160 ms
mobilenavigation.css
161 ms
logstate2-css.php
186 ms
logstate-js.php
196 ms
web.js
354 ms
web.bundle.js
161 ms
mobilenavigation.js
171 ms
common,shoppingbasket
251 ms
282 ms
pfcsupport.js
196 ms
basic.css
215 ms
web.css
224 ms
basic.css
250 ms
web.css
259 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
276 ms
emotionheader755780955.png
69 ms
print.css
57 ms
logo.jpg
75 ms
master_card.png
64 ms
visa_card.png
62 ms
all_credit_cards.png
64 ms
paypal_card.png
62 ms
order.js
42 ms
thumb_903785089.jpg
88 ms
thumb_903785090.jpg
88 ms
thumb_903785091.jpg
141 ms
thumb_903785092.jpg
131 ms
thumb_903785093.jpg
133 ms
thumb_903785094.jpg
132 ms
thumb_903785095.jpg
127 ms
thumb_903785096.jpg
169 ms
thumb_903785097.jpg
167 ms
thumb_903785098.png
173 ms
thumb_903785099.jpg
174 ms
thumb_903785100.jpg
170 ms
thumb_903785101.png
178 ms
thumb_903785102.png
206 ms
thumb_903785103.png
230 ms
thumb_903785104.jpg
232 ms
thumb_903785105.jpg
231 ms
thumb_903785106.jpg
232 ms
thumb_903785107.jpg
232 ms
thumb_903785108.jpg
243 ms
thumb_903785109.jpg
257 ms
thumb_903785110.png
253 ms
thumb_903785111.png
253 ms
thumb_903785112.png
269 ms
thumb_903785113.png
254 ms
thumb_903785114.png
285 ms
thumb_903785115.png
297 ms
thumb_903785116.png
294 ms
thumb_903785117.jpg
293 ms
thumb_903785118.jpg
304 ms
printer.gif
76 ms
logo.gif
75 ms
paymentTypes.js
46 ms
en_US
70 ms
jquery.numberformatter-1.2.3.js
43 ms
jquery-1.11.1.min.js
136 ms
jquery.fancybox.js
66 ms
epagesBasket.js
60 ms
web.js
77 ms
en_US
104 ms
cache_903785089.jpg
374 ms
cache_903785090.jpg
343 ms
cache_903785091.jpg
385 ms
cache_903785092.jpg
356 ms
cache_903785093.jpg
494 ms
cache_903785094.jpg
488 ms
next.png
88 ms
prev.png
97 ms
play-pause.png
99 ms
fullscreen.png
100 ms
cache_903785095.jpg
421 ms
cache_903785096.jpg
392 ms
cache_903785097.jpg
425 ms
cache_903785098.png
526 ms
cache_903785099.jpg
427 ms
cache_903785100.jpg
452 ms
cache_903785101.png
534 ms
cache_903785102.png
621 ms
cache_903785103.png
903 ms
cache_903785104.jpg
531 ms
cache_903785105.jpg
481 ms
cache_903785106.jpg
536 ms
cache_903785107.jpg
524 ms
cache_903785108.jpg
521 ms
cache_903785109.jpg
605 ms
cache_903785110.png
559 ms
cache_903785111.png
660 ms
cache_903785112.png
611 ms
cache_903785113.png
636 ms
cache_903785114.png
606 ms
cache_903785115.png
800 ms
cache_903785116.png
679 ms
cache_903785117.jpg
639 ms
cache_903785118.jpg
655 ms
highermark.com accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
highermark.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
highermark.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Highermark.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Highermark.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
highermark.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of HIGHER MARK. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: