5.2 sec in total
299 ms
4.7 sec
207 ms
Welcome to hijaipur.com homepage info - get ready to check Hijaipur best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about hijaipur.com
This website is for sale! hijaipur.com is your first and best source for all of the information you’re looking for. From general topics to more of what you would expect to find here, hijaipur.com has ...
Visit hijaipur.comWe analyzed Hijaipur.com page load time and found that the first response time was 299 ms and then it took 4.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
hijaipur.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.0 s
100/100
10%
Value1.0 s
100/100
25%
Value3.5 s
89/100
10%
Value2,230 ms
6/100
30%
Value0.197
62/100
15%
Value4.7 s
80/100
10%
299 ms
3225 ms
76 ms
216 ms
218 ms
Our browser made a total of 71 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (65 requests) were addressed to the original Hijaipur.com, 6% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Hijaipur.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (80%)
1.5 MB
303.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Hijaipur.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 857.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 53.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.6 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 53.5 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Hijaipur images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 427.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 427.0 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 756.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Hijaipur.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 756.4 kB or 88% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 57 (84%)
68
11
The browser has sent 68 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Hijaipur. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 35 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
hijaipur.com
299 ms
www.hijaipur.com
3225 ms
webfont.js
76 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
216 ms
layerslider.css
218 ms
css
26 ms
styles.css
149 ms
js_composer.css
528 ms
app.css
326 ms
animate.css
344 ms
font-awesome.min.css
261 ms
styles.css
264 ms
styles.css
321 ms
styles.css
331 ms
styles.css
333 ms
styles.css
394 ms
styles.css
406 ms
styles.css
400 ms
fresco.css
461 ms
idangerous.swiper.css
409 ms
owl.carousel.css
456 ms
owl.theme.css
465 ms
offcanvas.css
469 ms
nanoscroller.css
472 ms
select2.css
538 ms
easyzoom.css
539 ms
defaults.css
540 ms
woocommerce-overwrite.css
602 ms
header-topbar.css
546 ms
headers.css
593 ms
navigations.css
597 ms
header-default.css
608 ms
styles.css
731 ms
responsive.css
680 ms
style.css
657 ms
greensock.js
751 ms
jquery.js
772 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
704 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
746 ms
js
76 ms
layerslider.transitions.js
615 ms
css
15 ms
css
22 ms
jquery.form.min.js
666 ms
scripts.js
666 ms
jquery.touchSwipe.min.js
627 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
620 ms
idangerous.swiper-2.4.1.min.js
619 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
559 ms
fresco.js
626 ms
select2.min.js
674 ms
jquery.nanoscroller.min.js
625 ms
jquery.stellar.min.js
611 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
562 ms
imagesloaded.js
552 ms
easyzoom.js
594 ms
scripts.js
591 ms
wp-embed.min.js
585 ms
js_composer_front.js
581 ms
Banner4.jpg
461 ms
banner3.jpg
482 ms
baner5.jpg
465 ms
ADSMs-small.jpg
457 ms
final-miter.jpg
458 ms
ADSBench-small.jpg
461 ms
ADS-small.jpg
481 ms
adscompactsmall.jpg
469 ms
ADSTOP-small.jpg
461 ms
css
34 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
479 ms
skin.css
127 ms
hijaipur.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
hijaipur.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
hijaipur.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Page is blocked from indexing
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't use legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Hijaipur.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Hijaipur.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
hijaipur.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Hijaipur. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: