9.9 sec in total
1.6 sec
8.1 sec
256 ms
Visit hit-tracking.com now to see the best up-to-date Hit Tracking content for Belgium and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about hit-tracking.com
Vehicle and machine tracking, dispatching optimization, work time management and mobility calculation, tool management, ...
Visit hit-tracking.comWe analyzed Hit-tracking.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.6 sec and then it took 8.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
hit-tracking.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.2 s
43/100
10%
Value14.4 s
0/100
25%
Value11.8 s
4/100
10%
Value690 ms
43/100
30%
Value0.01
100/100
15%
Value13.1 s
12/100
10%
1585 ms
91 ms
255 ms
172 ms
181 ms
Our browser made a total of 65 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (53 requests) were addressed to the original Hit-tracking.com, 5% (3 requests) were made to Stats.ficos.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Hit-tracking.com.
Page size can be reduced by 663.3 kB (63%)
1.1 MB
392.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Hit-tracking.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 421.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 42.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 14.9 kB, which is 29% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 42.8 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 68.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Hit Tracking needs image optimization as it can save up to 68.2 kB or 24% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 297.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 297.1 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 255.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Hit-tracking.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 255.2 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 46 (79%)
58
12
The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Hit Tracking. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
1585 ms
language-selector.css
91 ms
bootstrap.min.css
255 ms
style.css
172 ms
bootstrap.css
181 ms
bootstrap-theme.css
183 ms
hit.office.css
178 ms
respond.min.js
183 ms
shortcode.css
266 ms
twitter-feed.css
267 ms
lightbox.min.css
267 ms
navigation.css
268 ms
cms-navigation-base.css
269 ms
cms-navigation.css
334 ms
ytprefs.min.css
335 ms
jquery.js
446 ms
jquery-migrate.js
361 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
355 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
361 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
416 ms
custom.js
416 ms
ytprefs.min.js
443 ms
jquery.cookie.js
447 ms
browser-redirect.js
448 ms
bootstrap.min.js
499 ms
fitvids.min.js
496 ms
wp-lightbox-2.min.js
531 ms
sitepress.js
530 ms
mobile-menu.js
532 ms
reset.css
373 ms
960_24_col_responsive.css
418 ms
prettyPhoto.css
419 ms
css
28 ms
twemoji.js
696 ms
wp-emoji.js
696 ms
iframe_api
644 ms
en-play-badge-border.png
700 ms
logo-Hit-Tracking-90.png
643 ms
hit-tracking.png
640 ms
access.to.tracking.jpg
633 ms
nav-arrow-down.png
632 ms
fr.png
633 ms
nl.png
725 ms
de.png
725 ms
slidertopshadow2.png
724 ms
slider.1.jpg
865 ms
slider.2.jpg
881 ms
slider.3.jpg
866 ms
footer-csep.png
792 ms
facebookicon.png
793 ms
twittericon.png
793 ms
piwik.js
850 ms
analytics.js
634 ms
slider-frame.png
272 ms
slider-overlay1.png
273 ms
undefined
1090 ms
left-nav.png
338 ms
right-nav.png
339 ms
WZDISdyil4HsmirlOdBRFInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
63 ms
Uvi-cRwyvqFpl9j3oT2mqn06qf9KHRHwsVx7iw5MXmY.ttf
105 ms
glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff
356 ms
www-widgetapi.js
56 ms
collect
19 ms
piwik.js
461 ms
piwik.php
85 ms
hit-tracking.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
hit-tracking.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
hit-tracking.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
FR
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Hit-tracking.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed French language. Our system also found out that Hit-tracking.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
hit-tracking.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Hit Tracking. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: