3.5 sec in total
122 ms
2.8 sec
667 ms
Click here to check amazing Household Staffing content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about householdstaffing.com
Meet Exceptional Domestic Staff in as Little as 3 to 10 Days Start the Introduction Process Why Household Staffing? Interview From our exclusive database,
Visit householdstaffing.comWe analyzed Householdstaffing.com page load time and found that the first response time was 122 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
householdstaffing.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.6 s
32/100
10%
Value11.8 s
0/100
25%
Value9.6 s
11/100
10%
Value1,750 ms
10/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value16.0 s
6/100
10%
122 ms
839 ms
70 ms
126 ms
142 ms
Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 58% of them (39 requests) were addressed to the original Householdstaffing.com, 7% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to S7.addthis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (983 ms) relates to the external source Static.olark.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.9 MB (76%)
2.5 MB
611.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Householdstaffing.com main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 139.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 139.3 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 9.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Household Staffing images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 695.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 695.5 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.1 MB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Householdstaffing.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.1 MB or 89% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (65%)
57
20
The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Household Staffing. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
householdstaffing.com
122 ms
householdstaffing.com
839 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
70 ms
formidablepro.css
126 ms
wppb.css
142 ms
google-places-reviews.min.css
116 ms
js_composer.min.css
189 ms
wpjb-glyphs.css
117 ms
frontend.css
139 ms
style.css
266 ms
jetpack.css
147 ms
jquery.js
176 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
156 ms
wppb_animate.js
161 ms
google-places-reviews.min.js
261 ms
frontend.js
262 ms
scripts.js
302 ms
apiresults.js
90 ms
addthis_widget.js
93 ms
font-awesome.min.css
286 ms
qppr_frontend_script.min.js
288 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
87 ms
gprofiles.js
283 ms
wpgroho.js
284 ms
jquery.selectlist.pack.js
287 ms
comment-reply.min.js
285 ms
wp-embed.min.js
287 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
291 ms
waypoints.min.js
287 ms
e-201611.js
84 ms
number-changer.js
119 ms
css
68 ms
analytics.js
286 ms
house-interior-cover__1452828182_71.238.1.251.jpg
284 ms
logo-white.svg
218 ms
bhhs-trust-logo.png
244 ms
ina-trust-logo.png
225 ms
hs-icon-nationwide-open1.svg
222 ms
hs-icon-fit-open.svg
220 ms
hs-icon-needs-open.svg
244 ms
hs-icon-safety-open.svg
247 ms
hs-icon-value-open.svg
248 ms
testimonial-one__1452828388_71.238.1.251.jpg
245 ms
testimonial-two__1452828338_71.238.1.251.jpg
250 ms
testimonial-three__1452828427_71.238.1.251.jpg
271 ms
BfQP1MR3mJNaumtWa4Tizg.ttf
48 ms
V86VyqXbc09Sss3BPsMj16CWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
454 ms
Yir4ZDsCn4g1kWopdg-ehInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
575 ms
sKd0EMYPAh5PYCRKSryvW6CWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
575 ms
32nyIRHyCu6iqEka_hbKsonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
576 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
510 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
525 ms
linkid.js
17 ms
collect
8 ms
collect
708 ms
loader0.js
983 ms
getnumdata.js
550 ms
hovercard.css
322 ms
services.css
366 ms
boost
322 ms
300lo.json
304 ms
g.gif
239 ms
sh.07f0d9bf220d07a763adad1e.html
144 ms
pixel.gif
102 ms
pixel.gif
76 ms
ga-audiences
343 ms
layers.173914a8ea2767730b7b.js
23 ms
householdstaffing.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
householdstaffing.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
householdstaffing.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Householdstaffing.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Householdstaffing.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
householdstaffing.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Household Staffing. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: