1.5 sec in total
172 ms
1.2 sec
107 ms
Click here to check amazing Htl content for Turkey. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about htl.li
Shorten URLs, track performance, and create custom vanity links with Ow.ly. Try it for free today!
Visit htl.liWe analyzed Htl.li page load time and found that the first response time was 172 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.
htl.li performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.4 s
2/100
10%
Value6.6 s
8/100
25%
Value13.8 s
1/100
10%
Value10,170 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.081
94/100
15%
Value36.3 s
0/100
10%
172 ms
30 ms
30 ms
117 ms
46 ms
Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Htl.li, 11% (5 requests) were made to Google.com and 9% (4 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (245 ms) relates to the external source 407-oyz-482.mktoresp.com.
Page size can be reduced by 421.4 kB (64%)
660.1 kB
238.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Htl.li main page is 660.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 611.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 10.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 10.6 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Htl images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 391.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 391.3 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 19.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Htl.li needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 19.5 kB or 68% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (80%)
40
8
The browser has sent 40 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Htl. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
shorten-url
172 ms
css
30 ms
app.6b0c6c9b51a86f1d.gz.css
30 ms
9c23d8d067c270d618274dd8efa605efe4ce7a09
117 ms
app.62a225d4ae9df5e3.gz.js
46 ms
gtm.js
42 ms
bg_logo_owly_tagline.4f20d3ab39353ec6.png
13 ms
IgZJs4-7SA1XX_edsoXWog.ttf
53 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
139 ms
insight.min.js
78 ms
ga.js
78 ms
conversion_async.js
76 ms
analytics.js
75 ms
jdjxavlsz0.js
73 ms
munchkin.js
68 ms
1LGaL9lI.min.js
32 ms
iframe_api
99 ms
fbds.js
26 ms
ayah-modal.css
113 ms
5557.js
74 ms
aTm.js
75 ms
munchkin.js
65 ms
tp
68 ms
__utm.gif
66 ms
collect
129 ms
ect.html.gz
85 ms
148 ms
collect
35 ms
collect
45 ms
69 ms
69 ms
77 ms
68 ms
visitWebPage
245 ms
www-widgetapi.js
62 ms
s
89 ms
u
109 ms
67 ms
45 ms
41 ms
46 ms
38 ms
ip.json
29 ms
collect
14 ms
geo.api.qualaroo.com
55 ms
39 ms
20 ms
htl.li accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
htl.li best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
htl.li SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Htl.li can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Htl.li main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
htl.li
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Htl. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: