Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

Page Load Speed

3.4 sec in total

First Response

495 ms

Resources Loaded

2.4 sec

Page Rendered

533 ms

hungerbox.in screenshot

About Website

Visit hungerbox.in now to see the best up-to-date Hungerbox content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about hungerbox.in

Looking for great corporate and office catering services for your company? Join startups like Uber, Hike and OnePlus to change the way your employees eat.

Visit hungerbox.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Hungerbox.in page load time and found that the first response time was 495 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

hungerbox.in performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

hungerbox.in

495 ms

semantic.min.css

877 ms

new_style.css

441 ms

css

72 ms

css

85 ms

Our browser made a total of 37 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 65% of them (24 requests) were addressed to the original Hungerbox.in, 11% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 8% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Hungerbox.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 955.9 kB (71%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

383.1 kB

In fact, the total size of Hungerbox.in main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 692.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 14.0 kB

  • Original 18.6 kB
  • After minification 15.4 kB
  • After compression 4.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.2 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 14.0 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-29%

Potential reduce by 26.2 kB

  • Original 90.0 kB
  • After minification 63.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Hungerbox needs image optimization as it can save up to 26.2 kB or 29% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 470.5 kB

  • Original 692.6 kB
  • After minification 664.0 kB
  • After compression 222.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 470.5 kB or 68% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 445.3 kB

  • Original 537.7 kB
  • After minification 534.4 kB
  • After compression 92.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Hungerbox.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 445.3 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (41%)

Requests Now

32

After Optimization

19

The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Hungerbox. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

SEO Factors

hungerbox.in SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Hungerbox.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Hungerbox.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Hungerbox. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: