3.6 sec in total
802 ms
2.7 sec
123 ms
Visit hylafax.org now to see the best up-to-date HylaFAX content for Iran and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about hylafax.org
HylaFAX Open Source is designed around a client-server architecture. Fax modems may reside on a single machine on a network and clients can submit an...
Visit hylafax.orgWe analyzed Hylafax.org page load time and found that the first response time was 802 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
hylafax.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.1 s
3/100
10%
Value10.6 s
0/100
25%
Value12.5 s
3/100
10%
Value410 ms
67/100
30%
Value0.256
48/100
15%
Value9.0 s
34/100
10%
802 ms
76 ms
26 ms
43 ms
30 ms
Our browser made a total of 21 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (16 requests) were addressed to the original Hylafax.org, 10% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 10% (2 requests) were made to T38fax.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) relates to the external source T38fax.com.
Page size can be reduced by 82.7 kB (52%)
158.5 kB
75.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Hylafax.org main page is 158.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 77.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 9.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 9.6 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 22.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, HylaFAX needs image optimization as it can save up to 22.7 kB or 29% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 25.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 25.7 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 24.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Hylafax.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 24.7 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (35%)
17
11
The browser has sent 17 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of HylaFAX. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.
hylafax.org
802 ms
Main_Page
76 ms
main.css
26 ms
index.php
43 ms
wikibits.js
30 ms
urchin.js
20 ms
KHTMLFixes.css
33 ms
__utm.gif
17 ms
t38logo.jpg
1599 ms
somerights20.png
8 ms
user.gif
13 ms
small_frog.png
13 ms
hylaee_background.png
14 ms
hylaeebox.png
22 ms
bullet.gif
14 ms
learn_more_hylafaxee.png
15 ms
external.png
23 ms
file_icon.gif
24 ms
poweredby_mediawiki_88x31.png
24 ms
commonPrint.css
17 ms
t38logo.jpg
85 ms
hylafax.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
hylafax.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
hylafax.org SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Hylafax.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Hylafax.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
hylafax.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of HylaFAX. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: