45 sec in total
3 sec
33.6 sec
8.4 sec
Click here to check amazing IFAC content for Pakistan. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ifac.org
Visit ifac.orgWe analyzed Ifac.org page load time and found that the first response time was 3 sec and then it took 42 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster.
ifac.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.9 s
4/100
10%
Value15.7 s
0/100
25%
Value10.2 s
8/100
10%
Value1,380 ms
16/100
30%
Value0.195
63/100
15%
Value19.8 s
2/100
10%
2969 ms
2580 ms
776 ms
774 ms
762 ms
Our browser made a total of 103 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 48% of them (49 requests) were addressed to the original Ifac.org, 42% (43 requests) were made to 6069270ab00fbdf6f66e-fdf3d356c5827c7b633f9c9c0112d03f.ssl.cf1.rackcdn.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fast.fonts.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (17.6 sec) relates to the external source 6069270ab00fbdf6f66e-fdf3d356c5827c7b633f9c9c0112d03f.ssl.cf1.rackcdn.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.7 MB (64%)
2.7 MB
990.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Ifac.org main page is 2.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 49.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 49.5 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 118.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, IFAC needs image optimization as it can save up to 118.6 kB or 22% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 922.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 922.4 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 656.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ifac.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 656.3 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 61 (61%)
100
39
The browser has sent 100 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of IFAC. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 29 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ifac.org
2969 ms
www.ifac.org
2580 ms
7e449ea9-89cd-402d-89fa-3bdcd8dfb8a8.css
776 ms
system.base.css
774 ms
system.menus.css
762 ms
system.messages.css
763 ms
system.theme.css
934 ms
comment_notify.css
933 ms
aggregator.css
933 ms
comment.css
933 ms
date.css
762 ms
datepicker.1.7.css
761 ms
field.css
761 ms
field-collection-ajax.css
762 ms
node.css
838 ms
uc_order.css
838 ms
uc_product.css
838 ms
uc_store.css
839 ms
user.css
839 ms
forum.css
839 ms
views.css
839 ms
nominations.css
513 ms
ctools.css
512 ms
lightbox.css
603 ms
jquery.qtip.min.css
1682 ms
qtip.css
602 ms
rate.css
1670 ms
styles.min.css
2410 ms
print.css
2246 ms
jquery.min.js
1669 ms
jquery.once.js
1667 ms
drupal.js
1634 ms
lightbox.js
1635 ms
jquery.qtip.min.js
2109 ms
qtip.js
1632 ms
scripts.min.js
2209 ms
font-awesome.min.css
1878 ms
element.js
1870 ms
analytics.js
1652 ms
message-24-warning.png
2122 ms
border-left.jpg
2121 ms
border-right.jpg
5432 ms
logo-r.png
5306 ms
logo-print.jpg
5375 ms
icon-newsletter.svg
5763 ms
icon-lang.svg
5821 ms
icon-search.svg
5861 ms
arrow.gif
5736 ms
dd-sep.png
5805 ms
arrow-right.gif
6521 ms
menu-blue-corner.png
6520 ms
nav-down-arrow.png
6520 ms
menu-orange-corner.png
6520 ms
hdr-iaasb.png
6339 ms
hdr-iaesb.png
6518 ms
hdr-iesba.png
17085 ms
hdr-ipsasb.png
17271 ms
menu-green-corner.png
17270 ms
content-top.jpg
17084 ms
btn-close.jpg
17084 ms
slide-border.jpg
17270 ms
blue-mask.png
17271 ms
yellow-mask.png
17270 ms
green-mask.png
17271 ms
dot.png
17267 ms
home-callout-bg.jpg
17216 ms
spotlight-bg.jpg
17265 ms
spotlight-l.jpg
17558 ms
spotlight-r.jpg
17264 ms
footer-border-left.jpg
17214 ms
footer-border-right.jpg
16921 ms
home-content-bottom.jpg
17192 ms
icon-facebook-sm.png
16969 ms
icon-twitter-sm.png
17191 ms
icon-linkedin-sm.png
16971 ms
icon-youtube-sm.png
16971 ms
1.jpg
5449 ms
ifacc.jpg
5503 ms
3.jpg
5379 ms
welcome.jpg
5449 ms
arrow-blue.gif
5450 ms
phpThumb.php
6162 ms
phpThumb.php
5981 ms
phpThumb.php
6161 ms
btn-mosaic2015.png
6163 ms
spotlight.jpg
6161 ms
find.jpg
6162 ms
icon-facebook.jpg
16831 ms
icon-twitter.jpg
16832 ms
icon-linkedin.jpg
16763 ms
icon-youtube.jpg
16763 ms
icon-rss.jpg
16762 ms
icon-podcast.jpg
16762 ms
translateelement.css
2744 ms
main.js
13306 ms
collect
1053 ms
icon-rss-sm.png
12340 ms
icon-podcast-sm.png
12186 ms
fancy-hdr.jpg
12186 ms
arrow-right.gif
11682 ms
b4312891-e355-4bdc-80c9-ef3dbf7bd916.woff
11353 ms
working.gif
11965 ms
log.js
11152 ms
ifac.org accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
ifac.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
ifac.org SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ifac.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Ifac.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ifac.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of IFAC. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: