7.2 sec in total
1.3 sec
5.7 sec
257 ms
Welcome to ifflab.org homepage info - get ready to check Ifflab best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about ifflab.org
Visit ifflab.orgWe analyzed Ifflab.org page load time and found that the first response time was 1.3 sec and then it took 5.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
ifflab.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.1 s
9/100
10%
Value10.5 s
0/100
25%
Value11.3 s
5/100
10%
Value1,700 ms
11/100
30%
Value0.061
97/100
15%
Value12.6 s
14/100
10%
1313 ms
247 ms
740 ms
681 ms
683 ms
Our browser made a total of 40 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (37 requests) were addressed to the original Ifflab.org, 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Ifflab.org.
Page size can be reduced by 63.8 kB (21%)
309.6 kB
245.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Ifflab.org main page is 309.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 197.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 60.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 60.9 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ifflab images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (86%)
35
5
The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ifflab. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ifflab.org
1313 ms
layerslider.css
247 ms
style.min.css
740 ms
styles.css
681 ms
settings.css
683 ms
style.css
939 ms
uncode-icons.css
706 ms
style-custom.css
724 ms
css
35 ms
jquery.min.js
920 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
911 ms
greensock.js
1652 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
975 ms
layerslider.transitions.js
982 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
1152 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
1154 ms
'%20data-breakpoints-images='258,516,720,1032,1440,2064,2880
1295 ms
init.min.js
1221 ms
underscore.min.js
1226 ms
daves-wordpress-live-search.js
1378 ms
index.js
1383 ms
index.js
1463 ms
dot_irecommendthis.js
1471 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
1619 ms
mediaelement-migrate.min.js
1610 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.js
1709 ms
plugins.min.js
2456 ms
app.min.js
1845 ms
api.js
95 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
1847 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
1883 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
1964 ms
index.js
2017 ms
logo-1-1-4-uai-258x70.png
370 ms
Fingerprint-uai-258x258.jpg
373 ms
IFF-LAB-COVER-uai-258x172.jpg
401 ms
uncode-ajax.php
902 ms
uncode-icons.woff
1940 ms
uncode-ajax.php
995 ms
recaptcha__en.js
59 ms
ifflab.org accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
ifflab.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
ifflab.org SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ifflab.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ifflab.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ifflab.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ifflab. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: