4.2 sec in total
526 ms
3.5 sec
186 ms
Visit ifm.co.in now to see the best up-to-date Ifm content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ifm.co.in
Visit ifm.co.inWe analyzed Ifm.co.in page load time and found that the first response time was 526 ms and then it took 3.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
ifm.co.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.6 s
14/100
10%
Value40.9 s
0/100
25%
Value8.5 s
18/100
10%
Value1,720 ms
10/100
30%
Value0.217
57/100
15%
Value26.4 s
0/100
10%
526 ms
10 ms
73 ms
207 ms
138 ms
Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 57% of them (42 requests) were addressed to the original Ifm.co.in, 14% (10 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 11% (8 requests) were made to Scontent.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (853 ms) relates to the external source Scontent.xx.fbcdn.net.
Page size can be reduced by 1.3 MB (53%)
2.5 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Ifm.co.in main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 40.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 12.3 kB, which is 25% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 40.6 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 36.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ifm images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 886.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 886.6 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 371.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ifm.co.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 371.1 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (45%)
67
37
The browser has sent 67 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ifm. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ifm.co.in
526 ms
analytics.js
10 ms
colorbox.css
73 ms
materialize.css
207 ms
style.css
138 ms
jquery-2.1.1.min.js
216 ms
jquery-ui.js
354 ms
materialize.min.js
224 ms
validate.js
148 ms
jquery.colorbox.js
214 ms
demo.css
223 ms
responsiveslides.css
292 ms
responsiveslides.min.js
274 ms
registration.js
288 ms
jquery.carouFredSel.js
309 ms
jquery.simplyscroll.js
305 ms
rand.js
345 ms
jquery.simplyscroll.css
386 ms
jquery.bxslider.min.js
387 ms
additional-methods.js
387 ms
collect
13 ms
sdk.js
275 ms
fb_icon.png
96 ms
twitter.png
98 ms
wikki.png
93 ms
head.jpg
94 ms
1.jpg
253 ms
2.jpg
166 ms
3.jpg
311 ms
4.jpg
315 ms
5.jpg
297 ms
6.jpg
347 ms
7.jpg
251 ms
rountables.jpg
344 ms
Registration.png
344 ms
screening.jpg
383 ms
interactions.jpg
399 ms
viewing-rooms.jpg
403 ms
fancybox.png
407 ms
dosis-light.woff
413 ms
Material-Design-Icons.woff
498 ms
XBrqNexVAuQ
101 ms
www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css
68 ms
www-embed-player.js
89 ms
fBnyGA8Aionz5086-mElmoOSPUuyQ1M9Un647_EjucU.js
82 ms
ad_status.js
80 ms
2UX7WLTfW3W8TclTUvlFyQ.woff
76 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
80 ms
52 ms
xd_arbiter.php
211 ms
xd_arbiter.php
420 ms
page.php
353 ms
LUdypCgtRlc.css
287 ms
q68gy-v_YMF.js
488 ms
YvxwM8R7ol8.js
625 ms
ihptErjAmMX.js
556 ms
controls.png
315 ms
border.png
336 ms
loading_background.png
290 ms
loading.gif
291 ms
12565577_874566495973993_373683455846232571_n.jpg
471 ms
12548968_874560955974547_3161317562913903143_n.jpg
539 ms
554492_576550075739280_1991913147_n.jpg
636 ms
12027795_759145907519115_8964009712783217539_n.jpg
730 ms
12803234_1755425074677802_6847122600238054067_n.jpg
853 ms
12494807_587885984694910_7459057310522776979_n.jpg
744 ms
11107718_844151772323348_5387211179280263345_n.jpg
853 ms
10801530_10152831247178011_5460553750769507666_n.jpg
746 ms
wL6VQj7Ab77.png
76 ms
s7jcwEQH7Sx.png
75 ms
R9a_DtVRZgv.js
69 ms
cUDgRFxaoIk.js
70 ms
0JBr1QHp8Gi.js
70 ms
kDOzhTr2W91.js
134 ms
ifm.co.in accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
ifm.co.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
ifm.co.in SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ifm.co.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Ifm.co.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ifm.co.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ifm. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: