Analyze

ifont.ru: Каталог шрифтов. Всё о шрифте

Большой каталог шрифтов. Всё о шрифтах, полиграфии и допечатной подготовке.

Page load speed analysis

  • 68/100

    Normal result
  • 7

    Successful tests
  • 1

    Failed test
  • First response

    559 ms

  • Resources loaded

    2.4 sec

  • Page rendered

    171 ms

  • Total page load time

    3.1 sec

Click here to check amazing Ifont content for Russia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ifont.ru

We analyzed Ifont.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 559 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Page optimization

  • HTML 32.8 kB
    Images 7.6 kB
    Javascripts 90.8 kB
    CSS 245 B

    In fact, the total size of Ifont.ru main page is 131.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 90.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

    • Original 32.8 kB
    • After minification 5.3 kB
    • After compression 2.0 kB

    HTML optimization

    HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 27.5 kB, which is 84% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 30.8 kB or 94% of the original size.

    • Original 7.6 kB

    Image optimization

    Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ifont images are well optimized though.

    • Original 90.8 kB
    • After minification 90.8 kB
    • After compression 34.8 kB

    JavaScript optimization

    It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 56.0 kB or 62% of the original size.

    • Original 245 B
    • After minification 237 B
    • After compression 184 B

    CSS optimization

    CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ifont.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 61 B or 25% of the original size.

Network requests diagram

  • ifont.ru
  • template_css.css
  • show_ads.js
  • context.js
  • top100.cnt
  • banner-88x31-rambler-gray2.gif
  • top_line.jpg
  • logo.jpg
  • points.jpg
  • top_menu.jpg
  • search_input_bg.jpg
  • search_bg.jpg
  • home.jpg
  • devider.jpg
  • letter.jpg
  • left_devider.jpg
  • right_triple.jpg
  • right_ugol.jpg
  • DIPEDM.png
  • dev.gif
  • indent1.png
  • AlphaClouds.png
  • Amano.png
  • bottom_left.jpg
  • context_static_r1082.js
  • 77802
  • watch.js
  • left_bg.jpg
  • top_left.jpg
  • arrow.jpg
  • ca-pub-1885000219129768.js
  • zrt_lookup.html
  • show_ads_impl.js
  • shadow.jpg
  • dotted.gif
  • font_name_bg.jpg
  • view_font.jpg
  • download.jpg
  • t.bbn
  • footer_bg.jpg
  • hit
  • ads
  • osd.js
  • ads
  • ads
  • hit
  • counter2
  • counter2
  • 88.gif
  • m_js_controller.js
  • abg.js
  • favicon
  • googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
  • s
  • x_button_blue2.svg
  • Rf2QnA3orEL6Eez56HJgxRuQ77qJyxbefnbSCBE0iUQ.js

Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 52% of them (29 requests) were addressed to the original Ifont.ru, 9% (5 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 9% (5 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (572 ms) belongs to the original domain Ifont.ru.

Additional info on ifont.ru

Requests

The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ifont. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

9

Javascripts

35

Images

1

CSS

6

AJAX

51

All

Possible request optimization

1

Javascripts

10

Images

1

CSS

6

AJAX

33

Optimized

18

All

Normal result

IP address

Ifont.ru uses IP addresses which are currently shared with 13 other domains. The more sites share the same stack of IP addresses, the higher the host server’s workload is. It is strongly recommended that the host server should be changed or the hosting provider should be requested to give a different (separate) IP address for this domain.

Normal result

IP Trace

ifont.ru

romma.ru

seoexp.com

zakat.ru

footfetish-club.com

90.156.201.48

ifont.ru

romma.ru

make-up.ru

kaifolog.ru

myjackson.ru

90.156.201.76

ifont.ru

romma.ru

metronet.ru

tostovka.ru

prn.ru

90.156.201.96

DNS records

Type Host Target/ip TTL Other
A

ifont.ru

90.156.201.76 899
A

ifont.ru

90.156.201.48 899
A

ifont.ru

90.156.201.96 899
A

ifont.ru

90.156.201.104 899
NS

ifont.ru

ns2.masterhost.ru 899

HTTPS certificate

SSL Certificate

Ifont.ru has no SSL certificate. Web browsing can be safer with HTTPS connection, so we suggest that it should be obtained for this site.

Normal result

Visitor World Map

Country of origin for 70.4% of all visits is Russia. It’s good for Ifont.ru that their server is also located in Russia, as that enables the majority of their visitors to benefit from a much faster page load time.

Good result

Poor result

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ifont. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks:

ifont.ru

Language and encoding

Normal result

Language

RU ru language flag

Detected

RU ru language flag

Claimed

Encoding

WINDOWS-1251

Claimed

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ifont.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ifont.ru main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1251. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Share this report in social media

Analyze another website

Analyze