2.7 sec in total
552 ms
1.9 sec
218 ms
Visit igem.org.uk now to see the best up-to-date IGEM content for United Kingdom and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about igem.org.uk
Work in gas? then join IGEM and connect with a global network of members who gain access to events, webinars, and training across standards, policy and industry innovation. Licensed by the Engineering...
Visit igem.org.ukWe analyzed Igem.org.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 552 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
igem.org.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value8.8 s
0/100
10%
Value9.5 s
0/100
25%
Value19.6 s
0/100
10%
Value210 ms
89/100
30%
Value0.152
75/100
15%
Value13.3 s
11/100
10%
552 ms
196 ms
413 ms
208 ms
205 ms
Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (41 requests) were addressed to the original Igem.org.uk, 4% (2 requests) were made to Use.typekit.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to P.typekit.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (647 ms) belongs to the original domain Igem.org.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 663.1 kB (48%)
1.4 MB
718.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Igem.org.uk main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 693.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 27.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 27.1 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 18.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. IGEM images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 561.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 561.8 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 55.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Igem.org.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 55.8 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (59%)
49
20
The browser has sent 49 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of IGEM. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
igem.org.uk
552 ms
reset.css
196 ms
default_igem.css
413 ms
jquery.megamenu.css
208 ms
example.css
205 ms
Doc2Form.css
212 ms
applist.css
287 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.1.css
316 ms
jquery-1.4.2.min.js
618 ms
jquery.curvycorners.min.js
416 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.pack.js
423 ms
easyTooltip.js
390 ms
mgz8fvr.js
131 ms
wyr7saa.js
140 ms
nivo-slider.css
414 ms
jquery.nivo.slider.js
499 ms
jquery.tools.min.js
511 ms
gatag.js
510 ms
WebResource.axd
428 ms
ScriptResource.axd
647 ms
ScriptResource.axd
510 ms
jquery.megamenu.js
427 ms
p.gif
228 ms
ga.js
39 ms
p.gif
176 ms
page_background_.jpg
174 ms
main_grad.jpg
167 ms
logo.jpg
215 ms
new_icons.png
216 ms
gas%20industry%20awards%202016.png
517 ms
yppc%202016%20website%20banner.jpg
458 ms
web%20banner%20gas%20industry%20awards%202016%20.jpg
555 ms
homepage-banner-igem-academy-2014-v2.jpg
465 ms
home_banner_mask.png
315 ms
__utm.gif
65 ms
home_panel_about.jpg
228 ms
arrow.png
331 ms
home_panel_membership.jpg
334 ms
home_panel_standards.jpg
429 ms
IGEM-Homepage-Panel-News-and-Events.jpg
434 ms
footer_home_background.jpg
473 ms
4950701026843203269.js
423 ms
left_nav_off.png
420 ms
center_nav_off.png
474 ms
right_nav_off.png
474 ms
c3066973282b.js
14 ms
print.css
99 ms
usabilla_blue_rightSideFeedback.png
18 ms
arrow_white01.png
99 ms
bullets.png
103 ms
igem.org.uk accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
igem.org.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
igem.org.uk SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Igem.org.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Igem.org.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
igem.org.uk
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of IGEM. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: