11.3 sec in total
737 ms
10.3 sec
280 ms
Click here to check amazing Igpc content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about igpc.net.in
We are one of the best plywood dealers in Chennai, provide best quality and trusted plywood at an affordable price for more contact with us.
Visit igpc.net.inWe analyzed Igpc.net.in page load time and found that the first response time was 737 ms and then it took 10.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
igpc.net.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.8 s
12/100
10%
Value9.8 s
0/100
25%
Value16.1 s
0/100
10%
Value300 ms
79/100
30%
Value0.506
16/100
15%
Value12.0 s
16/100
10%
737 ms
1006 ms
27 ms
39 ms
744 ms
Our browser made a total of 76 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (65 requests) were addressed to the original Igpc.net.in, 9% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (5.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Igpc.net.in.
Page size can be reduced by 381.6 kB (36%)
1.1 MB
678.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Igpc.net.in main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 505.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 34.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 15.9 kB, which is 41% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 34.9 kB or 89% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 11.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Igpc needs image optimization as it can save up to 11.3 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 1.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 334.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Igpc.net.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 334.0 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (14%)
65
56
The browser has sent 65 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Igpc. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
igpc.net.in
737 ms
igpc.net.in
1006 ms
css
27 ms
css
39 ms
plugin.min.css
744 ms
style.css
985 ms
fancybox.css
730 ms
panzoom.css
732 ms
call.svg
1043 ms
whatsapp.svg
739 ms
logo.png
1210 ms
1.webp
5816 ms
2.webp
2195 ms
3.webp
3693 ms
about.webp
3460 ms
badge.png
1227 ms
low-cost.png
1453 ms
social-care.png
1714 ms
satisfaction.png
1696 ms
1.webp
2420 ms
2.webp
2201 ms
3.webp
2446 ms
4.webp
3415 ms
5.webp
2666 ms
6.webp
2691 ms
7.webp
2910 ms
8.webp
2938 ms
9.webp
3156 ms
quality.png
3181 ms
team-management.png
3399 ms
surface.png
3425 ms
satisfaction.png
3641 ms
1.webp
3659 ms
2.webp
3669 ms
3.webp
3703 ms
4.webp
3884 ms
5.webp
3903 ms
6.webp
3913 ms
7.webp
4720 ms
plugins.min.js
4930 ms
script.min.js
3402 ms
fancybox.umd.js
3671 ms
8.webp
3422 ms
9.webp
3610 ms
10.webp
3365 ms
line-awesomeeb4f.svg
3829 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedA.woff
15 ms
font
18 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEw.woff
28 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEw.woff
32 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1xlEw.woff
40 ms
co3ImWlikiN5EtrfIsA.woff
63 ms
co3FmWlikiN5EtJhB9O6k6A.woff
72 ms
line-awesomeeb4f.woff
3992 ms
11.webp
3422 ms
12.webp
3441 ms
13.webp
3500 ms
14.webp
3487 ms
15.webp
3007 ms
logo-white.png
3025 ms
qrcode.png
2809 ms
iframe_api
97 ms
1.webp
735 ms
2.webp
250 ms
3.webp
976 ms
4.webp
979 ms
5.webp
520 ms
6.webp
494 ms
7.webp
739 ms
8.webp
1019 ms
9.webp
1624 ms
2.webp
2909 ms
3.webp
3349 ms
loader.html
1220 ms
www-widgetapi.js
8 ms
slider_bg2_thumb.jpg
249 ms
igpc.net.in accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
igpc.net.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
igpc.net.in SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Igpc.net.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Igpc.net.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
igpc.net.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Igpc. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: