17 sec in total
2.8 sec
13.7 sec
524 ms
Visit ijbarr.com now to see the best up-to-date Ijbarr content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ijbarr.com
IJBARR
Visit ijbarr.comWe analyzed Ijbarr.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.8 sec and then it took 14.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
ijbarr.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.1 s
3/100
10%
Value6.1 s
12/100
25%
Value7.5 s
26/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value6.1 s
64/100
10%
2756 ms
23 ms
487 ms
998 ms
489 ms
Our browser made a total of 73 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (59 requests) were addressed to the original Ijbarr.com, 5% (4 requests) were made to Translate.googleapis.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to S7.addthis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (6.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Ijbarr.com.
Page size can be reduced by 888.4 kB (25%)
3.6 MB
2.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Ijbarr.com main page is 3.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 55.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 55.9 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 89.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ijbarr images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 703.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 703.4 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 39.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ijbarr.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 39.6 kB or 77% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (41%)
69
41
The browser has sent 69 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ijbarr. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ijbarr.com
2756 ms
css
23 ms
nivo-slider.min.css
487 ms
amazing.css
998 ms
style.css
489 ms
mootools-core.js
1761 ms
core.js
809 ms
caption.js
753 ms
jquery.min.js
3441 ms
jquery.nivo.slider.min.js
1284 ms
mootools-more.js
5195 ms
script.js
1181 ms
styles.css
1291 ms
NivooSlider.css
1204 ms
NivooSlider.js
1337 ms
addthis_widget.js
11 ms
element.js
35 ms
ga.js
31 ms
counter.php
93 ms
bg.png
268 ms
banner.jpg
277 ms
logo.png
521 ms
gif.png
278 ms
iifs.png
276 ms
drji.png
291 ms
goap.png
1001 ms
issn.png
577 ms
road.png
565 ms
unesco.png
548 ms
citefactor.png
564 ms
inno.png
777 ms
scholarsteer.png
820 ms
mainmenu.png
840 ms
mainmenu-h.png
839 ms
ijbarr1.jpg
5656 ms
ijbarr2.jpg
6341 ms
1.jpg
1532 ms
2.jpg
1117 ms
3.jpg
1655 ms
4.jpg
2261 ms
vol1-issue1.jpg
1394 ms
vol1-issue2.jpg
1657 ms
vol1-issue3.jpg
1770 ms
vol1-issue5.jpg
2193 ms
vol2-issue3.jpg
1925 ms
vol2-issue4.jpg
2043 ms
vol2-issue5.jpg
2182 ms
vol3-issue5.jpg
2294 ms
vol3-issue6.JPG
2440 ms
volume1-issue7.jpg
2715 ms
volume2-issue7.jpg
2511 ms
iframemarquee.php
2548 ms
sidebar.png
2690 ms
__utm.gif
39 ms
submitarticle.php
2667 ms
translateelement.css
34 ms
main.js
41 ms
300lo.json
33 ms
black-opacity-40.png
2651 ms
sh.8e5f85691f9aaa082472a194.html
16 ms
element_main.js
45 ms
translate_24dp.png
43 ms
l
52 ms
cleardot.gif
53 ms
left.png
2721 ms
arrow-left.png
2705 ms
right.png
2759 ms
arrow-right.png
2753 ms
formstyle-new.css
490 ms
incSupport.js
488 ms
bottombg.jpg
236 ms
10.png
288 ms
05.png
285 ms
ijbarr.com accessibility score
ijbarr.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
ijbarr.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ijbarr.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ijbarr.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ijbarr.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ijbarr. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: