11.8 sec in total
3.6 sec
7.9 sec
348 ms
Visit imagebuild.com now to see the best up-to-date Image Build content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about imagebuild.com
At Image Builders, we offer a massive selection of custom promotional products and custom apparel for every budget. With a variety of products in every imaginable category, we can help bring your bran...
Visit imagebuild.comWe analyzed Imagebuild.com page load time and found that the first response time was 3.6 sec and then it took 8.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
imagebuild.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.9 s
25/100
10%
Value4.9 s
29/100
25%
Value28.6 s
0/100
10%
Value20,770 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.243
51/100
15%
Value30.4 s
0/100
10%
3609 ms
78 ms
128 ms
149 ms
212 ms
Our browser made a total of 93 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (77 requests) were addressed to the original Imagebuild.com, 6% (6 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Imagebuild.com.
Page size can be reduced by 495.1 kB (18%)
2.8 MB
2.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Imagebuild.com main page is 2.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 67.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 67.2 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 73.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Image Build images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 34.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 34.4 kB or 18% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 320.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Imagebuild.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 320.1 kB or 74% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (35%)
84
55
The browser has sent 84 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Image Build. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.imagebuild.com
3609 ms
bootstrap.min.css
78 ms
flexslider.css
128 ms
font-awesome.min.css
149 ms
slick.css
212 ms
lightbox.css
613 ms
StyleSheet
691 ms
taTaXQyqbbI
136 ms
Utils.js
591 ms
jquery.min.js
579 ms
migrate-3.1.0.js
576 ms
bootstrap.min.js
575 ms
slick.min.js
578 ms
hoverIntent.min.js
578 ms
superfish.min.js
575 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
580 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
580 ms
lightbox.js
630 ms
ie10-viewport-bug-workaround.js
629 ms
iframeResizer.min.js
644 ms
IFrameUtils.js
635 ms
highslide-full.packed.js
637 ms
highslide.config.js
637 ms
highslide.css
637 ms
Pic
639 ms
Facebook.png
637 ms
LinkedIn.png
642 ms
Instagram.png
643 ms
Blog.png
642 ms
Pic
634 ms
Pic
632 ms
Pic
632 ms
cf-button.jpg
851 ms
centracare-carris-button.jpg
833 ms
ib-button.jpg
1095 ms
WEBlogPic
849 ms
WEBlogPic
835 ms
QPic
632 ms
www-player.css
17 ms
www-embed-player.js
105 ms
base.js
203 ms
fetch-polyfill.js
73 ms
ad_status.js
335 ms
css
342 ms
VM1LbcxuQZ7urdjSm15-Kft2IdlldgxYJTjOL3p1Mjw.js
240 ms
embed.js
57 ms
id
59 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
226 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
226 ms
full-shadow.png
109 ms
Pic
254 ms
QPic
110 ms
QPic
111 ms
QPic
114 ms
QPic
249 ms
QPic
248 ms
QPic
251 ms
QPic
254 ms
QPic
254 ms
QPic
257 ms
QPic
255 ms
QPic
256 ms
QPic
303 ms
QPic
258 ms
QPic
259 ms
QPic
298 ms
QPic
296 ms
QPic
299 ms
QPic
355 ms
QPic
300 ms
QPic
352 ms
QPic
435 ms
QPic
352 ms
QPic
355 ms
QPic
353 ms
QPic
437 ms
close.png
354 ms
loading.gif
431 ms
prev.png
432 ms
next.png
432 ms
Pic
435 ms
Create
251 ms
w8gdH283Tvk__Lua32TysjIfp8uK.ttf
32 ms
glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff
169 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
80 ms
analytics.js
142 ms
ajax-loader.gif
134 ms
slick.woff
38 ms
collect
85 ms
custom.png
45 ms
zoomout.cur
45 ms
loader.white.gif
44 ms
flexslider-icon.woff
38 ms
imagebuild.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
imagebuild.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
imagebuild.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Imagebuild.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Imagebuild.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
imagebuild.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Image Build. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: