5.9 sec in total
1.5 sec
4.1 sec
276 ms
Welcome to imcat.in homepage info - get ready to check Imcat best content right away, or after learning these important things about imcat.in
人的头脑太复杂,时间过得久,有时候连自己也被自己骗了,记下来才是最真实的……
Visit imcat.inWe analyzed Imcat.in page load time and found that the first response time was 1.5 sec and then it took 4.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
imcat.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.6 s
63/100
10%
Value2.6 s
86/100
25%
Value4.4 s
74/100
10%
Value680 ms
44/100
30%
Value0.259
48/100
15%
Value3.8 s
90/100
10%
1523 ms
1148 ms
956 ms
969 ms
980 ms
Our browser made a total of 22 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 64% of them (14 requests) were addressed to the original Imcat.in, 18% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 9% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Imcat.in.
Page size can be reduced by 218.7 kB (69%)
317.4 kB
98.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Imcat.in main page is 317.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 166.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 65.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 65.8 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 10 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Imcat images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 101.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 101.5 kB or 61% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 51.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Imcat.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 51.4 kB or 70% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (73%)
15
4
The browser has sent 15 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Imcat. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
imcat.in
1523 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
1148 ms
crayon.min.css
956 ms
vs2012.css
969 ms
droid-sans-mono.css
980 ms
css
24 ms
genericons.css
1004 ms
style.css
1013 ms
responsive.css
1166 ms
jquery-2.1.4.min.js
1823 ms
crayon.min.js
1408 ms
jquery-migrate-1.2.1.min.js
1217 ms
wp-embed.min.js
1226 ms
ga.js
123 ms
honeycomb.png
228 ms
Zd2E9abXLFGSr9G3YK2MsDR-eWpsHSw83BRsAQElGgc.ttf
32 ms
b9QBgL0iMZfDSpmcXcE8nDokq8qT6AIiNJ07Vf_NrVA.ttf
72 ms
WyXtbLelkv62W9rJf1sl7ohV7ohV7ohV7ohV7ohV7RK3pFr+gVvaJX9Ipe0St6tV6tV+vVerVerVfr1Xq1Xq3X6DV6jV7T9Yr3qXifivepdPIfY1AvlQABUnNepwAA
19 ms
BkZwJXYnumPMepfEA344yQ.ttf
71 ms
eFfAHNfFT0YtF77QmRKRj_esZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
72 ms
droid-sans-mono-webfont.woff
431 ms
__utm.gif
15 ms
imcat.in accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
imcat.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
imcat.in SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Imcat.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Imcat.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
imcat.in
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of PARSED_DOMAIN, but there is no image specified in description. It would be a good idea for the website admin to select a nice image that can properly represent the website in Open Graph data, otherwise the first found image will be taken for this purpose and social media information block will look like this: