Report Summary

  • 16

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    30% of other websites

  • 76

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 43% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

inbaseline.com

Gracenote | Entertainment Data & Technology Trusted by the World's Top Entertainment Platforms and Services

Page Load Speed

5.5 sec in total

First Response

181 ms

Resources Loaded

4.7 sec

Page Rendered

615 ms

inbaseline.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to inbaseline.com homepage info - get ready to check Inbaseline best content right away, or after learning these important things about inbaseline.com

Gracenote is the leader in entertainment metadata, helping people connect to the music, TV shows, movies and sports they love across the world’s most popular entertainment platforms and devices, from ...

Visit inbaseline.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Inbaseline.com page load time and found that the first response time was 181 ms and then it took 5.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

inbaseline.com performance score

16

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.7 s

2/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.8 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value17.5 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,380 ms

5/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.079

94/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value26.0 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

inbaseline.com

181 ms

www.gracenote.com

1006 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

221 ms

front.css

149 ms

gt.public.bootstrap.min.css

301 ms

Our browser made a total of 112 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Inbaseline.com, 80% (90 requests) were made to Gracenote.com and 11% (12 requests) were made to . The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.6 sec) relates to the external source Gracenote.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.3 MB (23%)

Content Size

5.7 MB

After Optimization

4.4 MB

In fact, the total size of Inbaseline.com main page is 5.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 77.6 kB

  • Original 90.2 kB
  • After minification 86.5 kB
  • After compression 12.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 77.6 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 58.0 kB

  • Original 3.9 MB
  • After minification 3.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Inbaseline images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 375.5 kB

  • Original 509.6 kB
  • After minification 432.9 kB
  • After compression 134.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 375.5 kB or 74% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 793.0 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.0 MB
  • After compression 329.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Inbaseline.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 793.0 kB or 71% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 44 (47%)

Requests Now

94

After Optimization

50

The browser has sent 94 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Inbaseline. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

inbaseline.com accessibility score

76

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

inbaseline.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

inbaseline.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Inbaseline.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Inbaseline.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Inbaseline. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: