Tools & Wizards About Us
inboxjournal.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 66

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    79% of other websites

  • 75

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 42% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 62

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    22% of websites

inboxjournal.com

Daily Journal and Diary Software - InboxJournal.com - InboxJournal.com

Page Load Speed

1.5 sec in total

First Response

82 ms

Resources Loaded

1.3 sec

Page Rendered

141 ms

inboxjournal.com screenshot

About Website

Visit inboxjournal.com now to see the best up-to-date Inbox Journal content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about inboxjournal.com

Secure, personal online journal and diary. Get reminders for journal entries, download your entries, and more.

Visit inboxjournal.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Inboxjournal.com page load time and found that the first response time was 82 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

inboxjournal.com performance score

66

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

65/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.8 s

30/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.1 s

93/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value360 ms

72/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.028

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.2 s

62/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

inboxjournal.com

82 ms

www.inboxjournal.com

697 ms

1803475265-grey.css

72 ms

1049230491-blue.css

72 ms

1929577357-orange.css

77 ms

Our browser made a total of 40 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (31 requests) were addressed to the original Inboxjournal.com, 10% (4 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (697 ms) belongs to the original domain Inboxjournal.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 254.9 kB (56%)

Content Size

455.4 kB

After Optimization

200.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Inboxjournal.com main page is 455.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 380.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 22.8 kB

  • Original 29.1 kB
  • After minification 28.5 kB
  • After compression 6.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 22.8 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 5.8 kB

  • Original 46.2 kB
  • After minification 40.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Inbox Journal needs image optimization as it can save up to 5.8 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-60%

Potential reduce by 226.3 kB

  • Original 380.0 kB
  • After minification 372.7 kB
  • After compression 153.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 226.3 kB or 60% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (62%)

Requests Now

37

After Optimization

14

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Inbox Journal. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

inboxjournal.com

inboxjournal.com

82 ms

www.inboxjournal.com

www.inboxjournal.com

697 ms

1803475265-grey.css

1803475265-grey.css

72 ms

1049230491-blue.css

1049230491-blue.css

72 ms

1929577357-orange.css

1929577357-orange.css

77 ms

main.css

main.css

78 ms

jquery-ui-1.8.11.custom.css

jquery-ui-1.8.11.custom.css

78 ms

index.css

index.css

91 ms

ads.js

ads.js

106 ms

ajax.js

ajax.js

107 ms

public.js

public.js

110 ms

show_ads.js

show_ads.js

5 ms

cse.js

cse.js

326 ms

loader.gif

loader.gif

86 ms

inbox-logo2.png

inbox-logo2.png

58 ms

menu_devider.png

menu_devider.png

56 ms

main-menu5.png

main-menu5.png

57 ms

1803475265-grey.png

1803475265-grey.png

55 ms

1.jpg

1.jpg

54 ms

2.jpg

2.jpg

88 ms

3.jpg

3.jpg

89 ms

journal.png

journal.png

90 ms

postemail.png

postemail.png

89 ms

profile.png

profile.png

89 ms

1049230491-blue.png

1049230491-blue.png

114 ms

1929577357-orange.png

1929577357-orange.png

120 ms

gb_rt.png

gb_rt.png

121 ms

permalink-icon.png

permalink-icon.png

122 ms

comment_icon.png

comment_icon.png

123 ms

gb_rb.png

gb_rb.png

123 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

23 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

38 ms

rum.js

rum.js

20 ms

ads

ads

27 ms

osd.js

osd.js

12 ms

gb_lt.png

gb_lt.png

88 ms

day-names.png

day-names.png

88 ms

gb_lb.png

gb_lb.png

81 ms

ga.js

ga.js

4 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

11 ms

Accessibility Review

inboxjournal.com accessibility score

75

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

inboxjournal.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

inboxjournal.com SEO score

62

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Inboxjournal.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Inboxjournal.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

inboxjournal.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Inbox Journal. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: