2.9 sec in total
8 ms
2 sec
866 ms
Click here to check amazing Indigo content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about indigo.design
Indigo.Design – a complete design-to-code system for designers and developers – integrating prototyping, design systems, user testing, and code generation.
Visit indigo.designWe analyzed Indigo.design page load time and found that the first response time was 8 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
indigo.design performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.1 s
48/100
10%
Value8.7 s
1/100
25%
Value10.0 s
9/100
10%
Value4,400 ms
1/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value22.3 s
1/100
10%
8 ms
14 ms
266 ms
49 ms
33 ms
Our browser made a total of 64 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Indigo.design, 25% (16 requests) were made to Static.infragistics.com and 8% (5 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (760 ms) relates to the external source Script.crazyegg.com.
Page size can be reduced by 155.6 kB (22%)
711.8 kB
556.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Indigo.design main page is 711.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 413.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 144.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 30.0 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 144.6 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 7.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Indigo needs image optimization as it can save up to 7.4 kB or 22% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 2.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 881 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Indigo.design has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (58%)
57
24
The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Indigo. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
indigo.design
8 ms
indigo.design
14 ms
indigo-design
266 ms
wxj2jjp.js
49 ms
DependencyHandler.axd
33 ms
DependencyHandler.axd
380 ms
api.js
129 ms
sf.common.js
39 ms
analytics.js
188 ms
gtm.js
385 ms
Infragistics-horizontal.svg
265 ms
IG-icon.svg
258 ms
indigo-design-transparent-tiles-background.svg
360 ms
indigo-design-logo.svg
361 ms
indigo-design-system-768-lazy-load.jpg
397 ms
indigo-design-prototyping-travel-mobile.jpg
480 ms
indigo-design-user-testing-768-lazy-load.jpg
393 ms
indigo-design-reviews-illustration-without-bar.svg
398 ms
indigo-design-4-star.svg
393 ms
indigo-design-5-star.svg
396 ms
placeholder1x1.png
410 ms
indigo-design-learning-library-new-480.jpg
417 ms
blog-lazy-load.png
415 ms
Seal-SOC2.png
412 ms
gdpr-badge.svg
410 ms
SOC2-badge.svg
413 ms
d
19 ms
d
79 ms
js
64 ms
p.gif
162 ms
js
76 ms
js
261 ms
collect
234 ms
collect
400 ms
collect
341 ms
5562.js
760 ms
insight.min.js
351 ms
bat.js
358 ms
adsct
631 ms
adsct
633 ms
02f365ba.min.js
630 ms
iframe_api
383 ms
gEx.js
608 ms
js
170 ms
collect
300 ms
js
168 ms
343031392.js
145 ms
ga-audiences
245 ms
www-widgetapi.js
117 ms
343031392
192 ms
ga-audiences
52 ms
sync
40 ms
sync
43 ms
tap.php
47 ms
ip.json
108 ms
www.infragistics.com.json
51 ms
rum
52 ms
log
155 ms
fe0cd9e3e34eb8a86f099c31f796da84.js
117 ms
collect
107 ms
clarity.js
20 ms
collect
51 ms
ga-audiences
33 ms
c.gif
13 ms
indigo.design accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA IDs are not unique
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
indigo.design best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
indigo.design SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Indigo.design can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Indigo.design main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
indigo.design
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Indigo. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: