9.8 sec in total
636 ms
8.7 sec
447 ms
Click here to check amazing Infibeam content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about infibeam.com
Visit infibeam.comWe analyzed Infibeam.com page load time and found that the first response time was 636 ms and then it took 9.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
infibeam.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.0 s
1/100
10%
Value7.0 s
6/100
25%
Value10.5 s
7/100
10%
Value290 ms
80/100
30%
Value0.029
100/100
15%
Value10.4 s
24/100
10%
636 ms
48 ms
434 ms
38 ms
731 ms
Our browser made a total of 71 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Infibeam.com, 13% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.8 sec) relates to the external source Ia.ooo.
Page size can be reduced by 780.0 kB (16%)
4.9 MB
4.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Infibeam.com main page is 4.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 4.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 61.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 9.3 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 61.4 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 709.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Infibeam needs image optimization as it can save up to 709.7 kB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 4.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 4.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Infibeam.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (39%)
57
35
The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Infibeam. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.ia.ooo
636 ms
css2
48 ms
style.min.css
434 ms
style.css
38 ms
dashicons.min.css
731 ms
style.css
475 ms
bootstrap.css
130 ms
owl.carousel.min.css
147 ms
font-awesome.min.css
147 ms
style-main.css
480 ms
fix.css
590 ms
select2.css
845 ms
jquery.min.js
1075 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
910 ms
email-decode.min.js
482 ms
navigation.js
486 ms
jquery-1.12.4.min.js
499 ms
bootstrap.js
517 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
527 ms
select2.js
1418 ms
custom.js
1022 ms
custom-dev.js
940 ms
hoverIntent.min.js
1415 ms
maxmegamenu.js
1415 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
1312 ms
analytics.js
300 ms
infibeam-logo-new.png
747 ms
1.png
745 ms
logo.png
749 ms
3.png
393 ms
4.png
743 ms
5.png
753 ms
6.png
480 ms
7.png
1013 ms
fable-logo.jpeg
746 ms
9.png
1095 ms
logo.svg
1107 ms
heading-bottom-border.svg
748 ms
top-cross-img.png
1103 ms
top-dots.svg
1758 ms
Group-14815.png
1125 ms
Group-14819.png
1602 ms
Group-14821.png
2596 ms
Group-14817.png
2596 ms
Group-14816.png
2355 ms
Group-14814.png
2592 ms
Payment-Acquisition.png
1903 ms
Payment-Issuance.png
3598 ms
Neo-Banking.png
3597 ms
Enterprise-Marketplace-Platform.png
3597 ms
Bill-Payment-Platform.png
4496 ms
Hospitality-Platform.png
4004 ms
Shekhar-Singh.png
3591 ms
Purvesh-Parikh.png
4491 ms
INDIA.svg
3837 ms
SAUDI-ARABIA.svg
4597 ms
UAE.svg
3603 ms
USA.svg
3396 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrFJA.ttf
258 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9V1s.ttf
385 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8V1s.ttf
430 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_V1s.ttf
511 ms
pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTedw.ttf
512 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6V1s.ttf
510 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7V1s.ttf
516 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4V1s.ttf
516 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5V1s.ttf
517 ms
wARDj0u
11 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
4804 ms
collect
260 ms
js
86 ms
infibeam.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
infibeam.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
infibeam.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Infibeam.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Infibeam.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
infibeam.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Infibeam. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: