9.1 sec in total
676 ms
7.9 sec
506 ms
Click here to check amazing Infogap content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about infogap.net
ecopayz(エコペイズ)
Visit infogap.netWe analyzed Infogap.net page load time and found that the first response time was 676 ms and then it took 8.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
infogap.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.4 s
97/100
10%
Value2.3 s
93/100
25%
Value2.5 s
98/100
10%
Value730 ms
41/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value4.2 s
85/100
10%
676 ms
200 ms
562 ms
181 ms
1020 ms
Our browser made a total of 100 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 8% of them (8 requests) were addressed to the original Infogap.net, 45% (45 requests) were made to Infotop.jp and 9% (9 requests) were made to Asumi.shinobi.jp. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.4 sec) relates to the external source Infotop.jp.
Page size can be reduced by 237.1 kB (58%)
409.3 kB
172.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Infogap.net main page is 409.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 164.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 7.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 7.3 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Infogap images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 109.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 109.6 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 115.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Infogap.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 115.6 kB or 92% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (35%)
99
64
The browser has sent 99 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Infogap. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
infogap.net
676 ms
style.css
200 ms
087717400
562 ms
ads.js
181 ms
rakuten_widget.js
1020 ms
bg.jpg
190 ms
banner.gif
796 ms
arrow2.gif
341 ms
banner_ani_ig88x31.gif
678 ms
ranking3.gif
371 ms
Zen
345 ms
encount
524 ms
trac.js
879 ms
assault
613 ms
assault
590 ms
1.13.17
526 ms
fire
176 ms
247
173 ms
fire
175 ms
track
212 ms
track
210 ms
track
348 ms
cookiesync
372 ms
wra.gif
185 ms
ads-common.js
315 ms
sync
257 ms
cm
327 ms
mtwidget04.affiliate.rakuten.co.jp
505 ms
getrank_ex_id.php
986 ms
31dT2bUdirL._SY75_SX60_.jpg
7 ms
277 ms
41y5u460MwL._SY75_SX60_.jpg
9 ms
310I-nYn9oL._SY75_SX60_.jpg
6 ms
41TmJ3DdfLL._SY75_SX60_.jpg
7 ms
31bCxY2VkfL._SY75_SX60_.jpg
8 ms
pc_pcview_all.css
191 ms
front_merged.js
230 ms
mtwidget03.affiliate.ashiato.rakuten.co.jp
514 ms
getMWConf.php
318 ms
infocart.css
669 ms
basic.css
379 ms
loading.gif
79 ms
buttons.gif
16 ms
62778.jpg
921 ms
rank_1.gif
474 ms
stay.gif
474 ms
rank_2.gif
473 ms
rank_3.gif
471 ms
56968.jpg
1074 ms
39960.jpg
889 ms
templateone
1536 ms
rank_4.gif
323 ms
55113.jpg
577 ms
00000001743037_a01.jpg
278 ms
a.gif
511 ms
getrank_bg_img.gif
188 ms
rankitem_icon.png
190 ms
rankitem_pr.png
384 ms
a.ranking.gif
667 ms
dash-line.gif
570 ms
rankitem_1.png
711 ms
hp_62281.png
748 ms
rankitem_2.png
754 ms
hp_66620.jpg
900 ms
rankitem_3.png
818 ms
hp_58843.gif
977 ms
rankitem_4.png
882 ms
hp_54813.gif
1647 ms
rankitem_5.png
938 ms
hp_44072.jpg
1809 ms
rankitem_6.png
1053 ms
hp_64105.gif
1337 ms
rankitem_7.png
1121 ms
hp_52761.gif
1129 ms
rankitem_8.png
1218 ms
hp_2058.jpg
1308 ms
rankitem_9.png
1286 ms
hp_62964.png
1566 ms
rankitem_10.png
1440 ms
hp_58937.gif
2244 ms
rankitem_11.png
1475 ms
hp_65612.jpg
1915 ms
rankitem_12.png
1616 ms
hp_53754.gif
2074 ms
rankitem_13.png
1762 ms
hp_66637.gif
1806 ms
rankitem_14.png
1913 ms
hp_52429.gif
2191 ms
rankitem_15.png
1984 ms
hp_55876.gif
2065 ms
rankitem_16.png
2060 ms
hp_60457.gif
2354 ms
rankitem_17.png
2053 ms
no_img.gif
1870 ms
rankitem_18.png
1709 ms
hp_66971.gif
1761 ms
rankitem_19.png
1683 ms
hp_57698.gif
1667 ms
rankitem_20.png
1692 ms
hp_65442.jpg
1632 ms
infogap.net accessibility score
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
infogap.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Browser errors were logged to the console
infogap.net SEO score
JA
JA
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Infogap.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Japanese is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Infogap.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
infogap.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Infogap. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: