13.4 sec in total
522 ms
8.6 sec
4.3 sec
Click here to check amazing Info Land content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about infoland.me
The domain name InfoLand.me is for sale. Make an offer or buy it now at a set price.
Visit infoland.meWe analyzed Infoland.me page load time and found that the first response time was 522 ms and then it took 12.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
infoland.me performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value14.5 s
0/100
10%
Value19.6 s
0/100
25%
Value30.5 s
0/100
10%
Value11,190 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.094
91/100
15%
Value27.0 s
0/100
10%
522 ms
884 ms
2142 ms
175 ms
349 ms
Our browser made a total of 92 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Infoland.me, 65% (60 requests) were made to Press-crew.com and 24% (22 requests) were made to Loveisinthestars2016.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (5.8 sec) relates to the external source Loveisinthestars2016.com.
Page size can be reduced by 4.2 MB (40%)
10.5 MB
6.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Infoland.me main page is 10.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 9.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 550.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 550.2 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.7 MB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Info Land needs image optimization as it can save up to 3.7 MB or 38% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 1.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 1.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Infoland.me needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.1 kB or 14% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (31%)
58
40
The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Info Land. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
infoland.me
522 ms
884 ms
2142 ms
style.css
175 ms
content.css
349 ms
vertical-responsive-menu.css
509 ms
nav-layout.css
514 ms
horizontal_menu.css
518 ms
css
29 ms
font-awesome.min.css
39 ms
h2.gif
520 ms
avjyoyu.png
4318 ms
label.png
2108 ms
faleno.png
2642 ms
faleno2.png
2816 ms
sirouto.png
4930 ms
siroutotv.png
4740 ms
eroanime.png
5569 ms
31daysfree.png
4028 ms
nikaidouyume.png
4377 ms
natsukirin.png
5415 ms
hiiragikaede.png
5682 ms
unextadult.png
5590 ms
unextadult2.png
5613 ms
31daysfreetrial.png
5106 ms
ryokin.png
5283 ms
visa.png
5466 ms
master.png
5592 ms
jcb.png
5647 ms
amex.png
5744 ms
diners.png
5766 ms
otoku1.png
5765 ms
otoku2.png
5789 ms
header.jpg
423 ms
contents1.png
423 ms
unextadult.png
576 ms
unextadult2.png
583 ms
contents2.png
587 ms
contents3.png
595 ms
contents4.png
596 ms
contents5.png
597 ms
contents6.png
744 ms
contents7.png
752 ms
contents8.png
756 ms
contents9.png
768 ms
contents10.png
770 ms
contents11.png
771 ms
contents12.png
943 ms
contents13.png
1211 ms
contents14.png
1211 ms
contents15.png
1211 ms
contents16.png
1212 ms
contents17.png
1213 ms
style.css
504 ms
06-700-02.jpg
256 ms
15070001.jpg
255 ms
content.css
498 ms
vertical-responsive-menu.css
359 ms
nav-layout.css
472 ms
horizontal_menu.css
495 ms
h2.gif
791 ms
header.jpg
1065 ms
contents1.png
792 ms
unextadult.png
1816 ms
unextadult2.png
1200 ms
contents2.png
640 ms
contents3.png
899 ms
contents4.png
630 ms
contents5.png
891 ms
jquery.min.js
17 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
21 ms
script.php
1048 ms
contents6.png
748 ms
contents7.png
1000 ms
contents8.png
996 ms
contents9.png
1015 ms
contents10.png
986 ms
contents11.png
985 ms
contents12.png
979 ms
contents13.png
724 ms
contents14.png
721 ms
contents15.png
750 ms
contents16.png
747 ms
contents17.png
879 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
22 ms
TK3gWksYAxQ7jbsKcg8Ene9tKZ2s.ttf
270 ms
footerFixed.js
885 ms
link.jpg
888 ms
vertical-responsive-menu.min.js
917 ms
scrolltopcontrol.js
916 ms
nav.jquery.min.js
1037 ms
contents18.png
1052 ms
infoland.me accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
infoland.me best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
infoland.me SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't use legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
JA
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Infoland.me can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed Japanese language. Our system also found out that Infoland.me main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
infoland.me
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Info Land. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: