4.7 sec in total
912 ms
3.7 sec
93 ms
Click here to check amazing Infolio content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about infolio.co
Clean, simple, yet powerful — Infolio is great for smaller teams, remote teams and anyone working from home. Kanban boards, custom fields, project management, team collaboration, calendar, collaborati...
Visit infolio.coWe analyzed Infolio.co page load time and found that the first response time was 912 ms and then it took 3.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
infolio.co performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.7 s
30/100
10%
Value6.3 s
11/100
25%
Value20.7 s
0/100
10%
Value41,230 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value53.6 s
0/100
10%
912 ms
115 ms
184 ms
184 ms
26 ms
Our browser made a total of 106 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Infolio.co, 77% (82 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com and 15% (16 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 579.8 kB (52%)
1.1 MB
544.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Infolio.co main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 621.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 497.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 497.4 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 82.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Infolio needs image optimization as it can save up to 82.3 kB or 18% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 48 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (28%)
97
70
The browser has sent 97 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Infolio. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.infolio.co
912 ms
minified.js
115 ms
focus-within-polyfill.js
184 ms
polyfill.min.js
184 ms
bootstrap-features.24d4529b.bundle.min.js
26 ms
main.24eb524d.bundle.min.js
31 ms
lodash.min.js
52 ms
react.production.min.js
21 ms
siteTags.bundle.min.js
40 ms
cookieconsent.min.css
130 ms
cookieconsent.min.js
159 ms
thunderbolt
126 ms
elementory-browser-support.min.js
43 ms
thunderbolt
17 ms
wix-perf-measure.bundle.min.js
410 ms
react-dom.production.min.js
410 ms
Oval.png
733 ms
header-06%402x.png
891 ms
logo%20color%20grey_3x-min.png
818 ms
header-03%402x-min.png
885 ms
download-appstore-min.png
891 ms
header-05%402x-min.png
884 ms
header-04%402x-min.png
841 ms
header-01%402x.png
968 ms
play%402x-min.png
1018 ms
Group%20186%402x.png
1019 ms
logos%402x-min.png
934 ms
img-1-1-1%402x-min.png
1057 ms
img-1%402x.png
894 ms
img-1-1%402x.png
969 ms
img-2-2%402x.png
1110 ms
img-2%402x.png
1037 ms
img-3%402x.png
970 ms
img-3-3%402x.png
988 ms
img-4-4%402x.png
1082 ms
con-03%402x-min.png
1102 ms
Group%2069%402x-min.png
1148 ms
img-5%402x.png
1156 ms
img-5-5%402x.png
1203 ms
img-6-6%402x.png
1257 ms
con-02%402x-min.png
1550 ms
Group%20155%402x-min.png
1243 ms
img-7%402x.png
1242 ms
img-7-7%402x.png
1272 ms
img-8-8%402x.png
1348 ms
img-8%402x.png
1365 ms
img-9%402x.png
1549 ms
img-9-9%402x.png
1369 ms
img-10-10%402x.png
1471 ms
con-01%402x-min.png
1474 ms
img-10%402x.png
1597 ms
problem-6-a%402x.png
1371 ms
file.woff
691 ms
file.woff
680 ms
file.woff
656 ms
file.woff
612 ms
file.woff
611 ms
problem-1%402x.png
688 ms
map-min.png
606 ms
logo-08%402x-min.png
746 ms
Group%2034.png
713 ms
logo-06%402x-min.png
697 ms
logo-07%402x-min.png
724 ms
logo-05%402x-min.png
759 ms
logo-02%402x-min.png
789 ms
logo-04%402x-min.png
630 ms
logo-01%402x-min.png
737 ms
logo-03%402x-min.png
807 ms
Group%20342.png
783 ms
map-min.png
763 ms
arrow%402x.png
780 ms
view-a-01%402x.png
803 ms
view-02%402x.png
963 ms
view-03%402x.png
790 ms
view-04%402x.png
762 ms
preview-01%402x.png
1026 ms
view-person-04%402x-min.png
728 ms
preview-tasks-01%402x-min.png
828 ms
cup-08%402x-min.png
800 ms
cup-06%402x-min.png
757 ms
cup-03%402x-min.png
785 ms
cup-02%402x-min.png
847 ms
cup-05%402x-min.png
869 ms
cup-07%402x-min.png
783 ms
cup-04%402x-min.png
778 ms
cup-01%402x-min.png
830 ms
78f01e_13dd093ca8044d7daf64f5ff23310f98~mv2.png
903 ms
Group%204-min.png
873 ms
Group%2022-min.png
776 ms
Group%209-min.png
793 ms
Group%2024.png
765 ms
Group%2021-min.png
919 ms
Group%2020.png
739 ms
Group%205.png
739 ms
Group%207.png
693 ms
Slice%20Copy%402x.png
673 ms
logo-white%402x.png
672 ms
Footer%402x-min.png
734 ms
deprecation-en.v5.html
21 ms
bolt-performance
75 ms
deprecation-style.v5.css
21 ms
right-arrow.svg
21 ms
shim.latest.js
32 ms
WixMadeforDisplay_W_Bd.woff
17 ms
WixMadeforText_W_Bd.woff
15 ms
WixMadeforText_W_Rg.woff
16 ms
infolio.co accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
infolio.co best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
infolio.co SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Infolio.co can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Infolio.co main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
infolio.co
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Infolio. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: