4.7 sec in total
676 ms
3.8 sec
244 ms
Click here to check amazing Inspectionmachine content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about inspectionmachine.net
Inspection Machine, Label Inspection Rewinding Machine, Manufacturer for Non-Woven, Film, Inspection System Slitter Rewinder, Fabric Inspection Machine
Visit inspectionmachine.netWe analyzed Inspectionmachine.net page load time and found that the first response time was 676 ms and then it took 4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
inspectionmachine.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.3 s
7/100
10%
Value14.7 s
0/100
25%
Value12.7 s
3/100
10%
Value2,250 ms
6/100
30%
Value0.016
100/100
15%
Value16.0 s
6/100
10%
676 ms
69 ms
39 ms
124 ms
122 ms
Our browser made a total of 81 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (72 requests) were addressed to the original Inspectionmachine.net, 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (676 ms) belongs to the original domain Inspectionmachine.net.
Page size can be reduced by 154.7 kB (27%)
566.5 kB
411.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Inspectionmachine.net main page is 566.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 320.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 64.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 64.7 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 29.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Inspectionmachine needs image optimization as it can save up to 29.3 kB or 25% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 53.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 53.6 kB or 17% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 7.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Inspectionmachine.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 7.1 kB or 14% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 55 (71%)
78
23
The browser has sent 78 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Inspectionmachine. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 43 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.inspectionmachine.net
676 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
69 ms
css
39 ms
custom.css
124 ms
flexslider.css
122 ms
slider-style.css
141 ms
screen.css
182 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
142 ms
jquery.fancybox-thumbs.css
143 ms
mediaelementplayer.css
177 ms
tipsy.css
176 ms
custom-css.php
592 ms
grid.css
194 ms
style.min.css
236 ms
styles.css
235 ms
settings.css
240 ms
jquery.min.js
296 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
243 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
361 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
288 ms
js
79 ms
js
72 ms
core.min.js
272 ms
accordion.min.js
275 ms
tabs.min.js
329 ms
swfobject.js
341 ms
jquery.fancybox.pack.js
341 ms
jquery.fancybox-thumbs.js
339 ms
jquery.easing.js
384 ms
gmap.js
391 ms
jquery.tipsy.js
390 ms
jquery.validate.js
392 ms
browser.js
387 ms
jquery.isotope.js
434 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
442 ms
reflection.js
441 ms
jwplayer.js
507 ms
hint.js
443 ms
api.js
85 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
491 ms
custom.js
464 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
559 ms
hooks.min.js
398 ms
i18n.min.js
443 ms
lodash.min.js
516 ms
url.min.js
534 ms
api-fetch.min.js
506 ms
index.js
503 ms
index.js
505 ms
wp-embed.min.js
492 ms
google.png
74 ms
twitter.png
69 ms
facebook.png
74 ms
pinterest.png
76 ms
grey_phone_icon.png
77 ms
grey_email_icon.png
75 ms
logo.png
153 ms
mobile_menu.png
154 ms
color.png
152 ms
dummy.png
155 ms
1-150x150.png
153 ms
2-150x150.jpg
154 ms
3-150x150.jpg
157 ms
4-150x150.jpg
156 ms
1-150x150.jpg
156 ms
arrow_up_24x24.png
149 ms
analytics.js
93 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1_FvsUtiYA.ttf
73 ms
collect
157 ms
gen_204
97 ms
wp-polyfill-fetch.min.js
60 ms
wp-polyfill-dom-rect.min.js
68 ms
wp-polyfill-url.min.js
70 ms
wp-polyfill-formdata.min.js
67 ms
wp-polyfill-element-closest.min.js
67 ms
wp-polyfill-object-fit.min.js
68 ms
recaptcha__fr.js
111 ms
revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js
174 ms
revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js
165 ms
revolution.extension.navigation.min.js
166 ms
revolution.extension.parallax.min.js
160 ms
inspectionmachine.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
inspectionmachine.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
inspectionmachine.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Inspectionmachine.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Inspectionmachine.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
inspectionmachine.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Inspectionmachine. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: