Report Summary

  • 67

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    80% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 89% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

intakeq.com

intakeQ Home Page| Online Intake Forms

Page Load Speed

1.5 sec in total

First Response

66 ms

Resources Loaded

749 ms

Page Rendered

659 ms

intakeq.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing IntakeQ content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about intakeq.com

Build your own online intake forms. Send them privately to your clients or embed them in your website. We are HIPAA compliant and support e-signatures

Visit intakeq.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Intakeq.com page load time and found that the first response time was 66 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

intakeq.com performance score

67

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.1 s

81/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

89/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.8 s

85/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value840 ms

34/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.021

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.0 s

33/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

intakeq.com

66 ms

intakeq.com

199 ms

css

55 ms

landing

96 ms

landing

213 ms

Our browser made a total of 29 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 69% of them (20 requests) were addressed to the original Intakeq.com, 10% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (2 requests) were made to Heapanalytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (327 ms) belongs to the original domain Intakeq.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 62.1 kB (8%)

Content Size

738.5 kB

After Optimization

676.4 kB

In fact, the total size of Intakeq.com main page is 738.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 679.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 32.5 kB

  • Original 38.3 kB
  • After minification 23.9 kB
  • After compression 5.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 14.4 kB, which is 38% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 32.5 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 29.6 kB

  • Original 679.2 kB
  • After minification 649.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. IntakeQ images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 50 B

  • Original 21.0 kB
  • After minification 21.0 kB
  • After compression 20.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

22

After Optimization

22

The browser has sent 22 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of IntakeQ. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

intakeq.com accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

intakeq.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

intakeq.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Intakeq.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Intakeq.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of IntakeQ. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: