5.7 sec in total
208 ms
2.1 sec
3.4 sec
Click here to check amazing Intask content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about intask.co
In February, I ceased operations at my startup, Intask, because I learned I was chasing the wrong problem. My vision was for Intask to leverage the growing freelancer economy and the plethora of…
Visit intask.coWe analyzed Intask.co page load time and found that the first response time was 208 ms and then it took 5.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
intask.co performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.5 s
68/100
10%
Value8.6 s
1/100
25%
Value10.8 s
6/100
10%
Value12,610 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.06
98/100
15%
Value20.6 s
2/100
10%
208 ms
198 ms
165 ms
603 ms
870 ms
Our browser made a total of 85 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Intask.co, 46% (39 requests) were made to Cdn-client.medium.com and 31% (26 requests) were made to Miro.medium.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) relates to the external source Miro.medium.com.
Page size can be reduced by 206.6 kB (15%)
1.4 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Intask.co main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 107.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 107.7 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 98.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Intask images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 46 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Intask.co has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (58%)
67
28
The browser has sent 67 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Intask. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 40 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
intask.co
208 ms
introducing-intask-to-education-94052ad50aaa
198 ms
unbound.css
165 ms
manifest.a5281da0.js
603 ms
221.eb6d4e84.js
870 ms
main.0e08b25f.js
878 ms
instrumentation.c71f0248.chunk.js
664 ms
4800.e59c250c.chunk.js
665 ms
1490.2e8e08de.chunk.js
663 ms
2837.7bf36ac5.chunk.js
662 ms
9282.7a8de01a.chunk.js
885 ms
AppLayout.5acdfcf2.chunk.js
888 ms
reporting.bbdcaa9d.chunk.js
882 ms
4270.c0f5b685.chunk.js
880 ms
1752.a348f767.chunk.js
888 ms
7794.9590314e.chunk.js
879 ms
8316.18f2a6aa.chunk.js
886 ms
4330.314a6cae.chunk.js
1180 ms
2981.c8b67800.chunk.js
1195 ms
3115.38ecb46c.chunk.js
1193 ms
5472.5f6d4371.chunk.js
1176 ms
4869.15af887a.chunk.js
1172 ms
9401.492bc814.chunk.js
1171 ms
2307.b2a54ca4.chunk.js
1238 ms
7070.94d1cda1.chunk.js
1231 ms
9442.5291e270.chunk.js
1228 ms
4483.0a43a5ce.chunk.js
1220 ms
210.1b33e4a9.chunk.js
1218 ms
864.f280c412.chunk.js
1226 ms
9841.1bb423da.chunk.js
1233 ms
3610.fcfa0e1c.chunk.js
1234 ms
1018.3d424dd7.chunk.js
1322 ms
9304.0cb94a81.chunk.js
1321 ms
763.3dd24340.chunk.js
1322 ms
8051.c536c001.chunk.js
1323 ms
188.6d5882e3.chunk.js
1320 ms
8621.c2bcf5a0.chunk.js
1322 ms
5754.6687b8d5.chunk.js
1323 ms
PostPage.MainContent.c08b67fc.chunk.js
1335 ms
v652eace1692a40cfa3763df669d7439c1639079717194
824 ms
1*RJvUHb9EdLkQSfWp8-X_gQ.png
741 ms
1*MgGapKEQPVM2qSc8Phc4Mg.jpeg
905 ms
1*RJvUHb9EdLkQSfWp8-X_gQ.png
1077 ms
1*uDMqyT2bVgeSQ6d_5kRT2A.png
1185 ms
1*75sOBwrIJ5vpVENG04rqZQ.png
1116 ms
1*mlZotlYSfBj66kSYO5Befw.png
1143 ms
1*nMJ9zAZ3C89BNBwH-zB1fA.png
1087 ms
1*tXQQ4NtQ95e71BQTY3cgzw.png
1107 ms
1*-hcc3qiQHiBegpyphhuCCw.jpeg
1182 ms
0*OopsCUIgyERlqzdY.jpg
1226 ms
0*qRFhA_tFEmAtBprS
1124 ms
0*zkwmKy5qNdbHYlBg.jpg
1155 ms
1*rP2XIQA_R8ya6bApWhOLLw.png
1261 ms
0*r01XCKcFn_zUCA2D
1251 ms
1*7Lji6sHZjyCwh-oq6MZNJA.jpeg
1182 ms
1*pMIqo3UFdWnkiIg-BsaCSg.jpeg
1304 ms
2*0H7G2Vac54PE1MC-ZQE_qw.jpeg
1207 ms
1*OpASK9uWBfLetm4aKM3CwQ.png
1216 ms
1*Cxc2MOySEBPmb7dFAVh_gQ@2x.jpeg
1324 ms
1*wooecqjmQOFS5Air8RZk6g.jpeg
1342 ms
1*GkcURTE5DOWLkJPEsTw_gA.jpeg
1275 ms
1*0k7_8AkETvBiBmCKHNIAJw.jpeg
1289 ms
1*A8_oT-wNlJOkrYJ2W5VAtw.jpeg
1424 ms
1*Crl55Tm6yDNMoucPo1tvDg.png
1303 ms
1*W_RAPQ62h0em559zluJLdQ.png
1308 ms
1*MgGapKEQPVM2qSc8Phc4Mg.jpeg
1331 ms
sohne-400-normal.woff
91 ms
sohne-400-normal.woff
303 ms
sohne-500-normal.woff
291 ms
sohne-500-normal.woff
290 ms
sohne-300-normal.woff
292 ms
sohne-300-normal.woff
292 ms
sohne-700-normal.woff
310 ms
sohne-700-normal.woff
329 ms
source-serif-pro-400-normal.woff
320 ms
source-serif-pro-400-normal.woff
321 ms
source-serif-pro-700-normal.woff
322 ms
source-serif-pro-700-normal.woff
325 ms
source-serif-pro-400-italic.woff
323 ms
source-serif-pro-400-italic.woff
633 ms
source-serif-pro-700-italic.woff
632 ms
source-serif-pro-700-italic.woff
629 ms
1987.e87f9d80.chunk.js
777 ms
8018.1546b78c.chunk.js
699 ms
PostPage.RightColumnContent.7bf8ea88.chunk.js
712 ms
intask.co accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
intask.co best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
intask.co SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Intask.co can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Intask.co main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
intask.co
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Intask. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: