Tools & Wizards About Us
integritysafety.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 31

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    51% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 89

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    67% of websites

integritysafety.net

Transportation Safety Services | Texas

Page Load Speed

5.1 sec in total

First Response

782 ms

Resources Loaded

3.6 sec

Page Rendered

712 ms

integritysafety.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to integritysafety.net homepage info - get ready to check Integrity Safety best content right away, or after learning these important things about integritysafety.net

If you are looking for transportation safety services in Texas, we are the best transportation DOT Safety Consultants to guide you in preparing for DOT and FMCSA compliance requirements. Contact us no...

Visit integritysafety.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Integritysafety.net page load time and found that the first response time was 782 ms and then it took 4.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

integritysafety.net performance score

31

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.2 s

3/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.5 s

5/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value500 ms

58/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.135

80/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.0 s

6/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.integritysafety.net

782 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

117 ms

post-21.css

177 ms

post-22.css

176 ms

style.min.css

179 ms

Our browser made a total of 83 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 72% of them (60 requests) were addressed to the original Integritysafety.net, 18% (15 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (782 ms) belongs to the original domain Integritysafety.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 321.6 kB (15%)

Content Size

2.1 MB

After Optimization

1.8 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Integritysafety.net main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 103.2 kB

  • Original 120.6 kB
  • After minification 114.9 kB
  • After compression 17.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 103.2 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 1.5 MB
  • After minification 1.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Integrity Safety images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 26.2 kB

  • Original 233.4 kB
  • After minification 233.3 kB
  • After compression 207.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 26.2 kB or 11% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-61%

Potential reduce by 192.3 kB

  • Original 313.1 kB
  • After minification 312.3 kB
  • After compression 120.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Integritysafety.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 192.3 kB or 61% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 46 (72%)

Requests Now

64

After Optimization

18

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 64 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Integrity Safety. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 22 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.integritysafety.net

www.integritysafety.net

782 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

frontend-lite.min.css

117 ms

post-21.css

post-21.css

177 ms

post-22.css

post-22.css

176 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

179 ms

theme.min.css

theme.min.css

173 ms

header-footer.min.css

header-footer.min.css

179 ms

post-5.css

post-5.css

180 ms

ekiticons.css

ekiticons.css

248 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

240 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

235 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

frontend-lite.min.css

239 ms

global.css

global.css

242 ms

post-10.css

post-10.css

237 ms

widget-styles.css

widget-styles.css

421 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

294 ms

css

css

36 ms

fontawesome.min.css

fontawesome.min.css

297 ms

solid.min.css

solid.min.css

292 ms

brands.min.css

brands.min.css

295 ms

regular.min.css

regular.min.css

300 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

413 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

352 ms

js

js

64 ms

widget-icon-list.min.css

widget-icon-list.min.css

350 ms

addthis_widget.js

addthis_widget.js

47 ms

animations.min.css

animations.min.css

305 ms

hello-frontend.min.js

hello-frontend.min.js

304 ms

frontend-script.js

frontend-script.js

362 ms

widget-scripts.js

widget-scripts.js

524 ms

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

363 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

362 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

525 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

522 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

521 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

526 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

521 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

523 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

524 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

523 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

461 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

503 ms

elements-handlers.min.js

elements-handlers.min.js

500 ms

animate-circle.min.js

animate-circle.min.js

500 ms

elementor.js

elementor.js

500 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

112 ms

Group-44.png

Group-44.png

197 ms

image-26-1-1.png

image-26-1-1.png

196 ms

logo.png

logo.png

197 ms

Group-6-1-1.jpg

Group-6-1-1.jpg

339 ms

shutterstock_117623971.jpg

shutterstock_117623971.jpg

340 ms

Fotolia_45698486_X.jpg

Fotolia_45698486_X.jpg

338 ms

shutterstock_691742317.jpg

shutterstock_691742317.jpg

273 ms

shutterstock_748195210.jpg

shutterstock_748195210.jpg

380 ms

shutterstock_528660739-1.png

shutterstock_528660739-1.png

339 ms

shutterstock_336055757.jpg

shutterstock_336055757.jpg

500 ms

Fotolia_543601_X.jpg

Fotolia_543601_X.jpg

566 ms

image-28.png

image-28.png

448 ms

image-27.png

image-27.png

448 ms

image-28-1.png

image-28-1.png

448 ms

image-27-1.png

image-27-1.png

448 ms

js

js

107 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

312 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

255 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

115 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

132 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf

141 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjr0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjr0B4gaVc.ttf

174 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

174 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf

142 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

317 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf

142 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1xlEA.ttf

140 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1xlEA.ttf

174 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf

174 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf

177 ms

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf

176 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEA.ttf

176 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_Z1xlEA.ttf

174 ms

pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTucHtF.ttf

pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTucHtF.ttf

175 ms

js

js

82 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

31 ms

collect

collect

74 ms

Accessibility Review

integritysafety.net accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

integritysafety.net best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

integritysafety.net SEO score

89

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Integritysafety.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Integritysafety.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

integritysafety.net

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Integrity Safety. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: