2.8 sec in total
210 ms
1.9 sec
710 ms
Welcome to interapthq.com homepage info - get ready to check Interapt Hq best content right away, or after learning these important things about interapthq.com
Visit interapthq.comWe analyzed Interapthq.com page load time and found that the first response time was 210 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
interapthq.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.1 s
46/100
10%
Value18.1 s
0/100
25%
Value5.6 s
53/100
10%
Value440 ms
64/100
30%
Value0.028
100/100
15%
Value7.0 s
52/100
10%
210 ms
209 ms
70 ms
126 ms
128 ms
Our browser made a total of 54 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Interapthq.com, 72% (39 requests) were made to Interapt.com and 7% (4 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (932 ms) relates to the external source Interapt.com.
Page size can be reduced by 823.8 kB (36%)
2.3 MB
1.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Interapthq.com main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 16.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 16.2 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 60.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Interapt Hq images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 493.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 493.2 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 254.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Interapthq.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 254.1 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (63%)
51
19
The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Interapt Hq. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
interapthq.com
210 ms
interapt.com
209 ms
css_xE-rWrJf-fncB6ztZfd2huxqgxu4WO-qwma6Xer30m4.css
70 ms
css_mCTyF_8_svnZzHcpIUANct53tsKA4ExYIFlU-WtoCXw.css
126 ms
css_JmZujFC-VjuFf8CIRrp0cBHN2-g7QZS65u0gA0slrHo.css
128 ms
css_qSXH-3am0fPnjMnnvlrU3PmB-bfVBwC4m4doMANztLk.css
129 ms
js_oCVMDTeSNt-_QxknevWyf6yO5OzmME3AhRz3ggZgNtg.js
206 ms
js_9PoCIpaBdXzAfwjeoO2ibi_TtEs6jMROpVOwk-_WIBw.js
127 ms
js_LeWX3yyYlqP9RulKi0dhmzp1FeWkP_OSwsMuVTxyoyg.js
223 ms
js
83 ms
js_ME5JoSd-1024etsFxNsJAbBlIQutvJ0tQeVrMCoYKQ8.js
186 ms
js_7h324ifclLGYFxFoatQ4-wnM2It7bPCH8oukRlW-nkY.js
186 ms
css
53 ms
analytics.js
81 ms
interapt_modal.js
81 ms
logo.png
78 ms
menu-leaf.png
79 ms
menu-expanded.png
78 ms
menu-collapsed.png
79 ms
home-page-banner.jpg
342 ms
banner-overlay.png
108 ms
explainer-pod-background.png
271 ms
cnet-logo.png
127 ms
gartner-cool-vendor-logo.png
134 ms
mashable-logo.png
147 ms
cnn-logo.png
171 ms
usa-today-logo.png
209 ms
kdhx-logo.png
242 ms
glass-certified-logo.png
245 ms
yum-logo.png
246 ms
humana-logo.png
270 ms
ge-logo.png
269 ms
scribblit-logo_0.png
279 ms
Home_Scribblit.png
454 ms
RelayLogotype-01-Large%20%283%29.png
480 ms
RelayPod_Screens%20%281%29.png
549 ms
togglit-logo.png
421 ms
togglit-feature-image.png
932 ms
radio-logo.png
399 ms
venues-logo.png
466 ms
hr-logo.png
548 ms
google-glass-feature-image.png
643 ms
enterprise-feature-image-2.png
544 ms
collect
21 ms
V0kNOkKhMnM
90 ms
collect
62 ms
www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css
20 ms
www-embed-player.js
40 ms
Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js
42 ms
ad_status.js
46 ms
pd.js
5 ms
common.js
22 ms
util.js
51 ms
infowindow.js
43 ms
interapthq.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
interapthq.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
interapthq.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Interapthq.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Interapthq.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
interapthq.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Interapt Hq. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: