2 sec in total
248 ms
1.6 sec
184 ms
Click here to check amazing Intercurve content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about intercurve.com
Visit intercurve.comWe analyzed Intercurve.com page load time and found that the first response time was 248 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
intercurve.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.6 s
95/100
10%
Value3.9 s
53/100
25%
Value2.5 s
98/100
10%
Value70 ms
99/100
30%
Value0.012
100/100
15%
Value4.1 s
86/100
10%
248 ms
80 ms
146 ms
217 ms
145 ms
Our browser made a total of 40 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Intercurve.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (531 ms) belongs to the original domain Intercurve.com.
Page size can be reduced by 193.1 kB (17%)
1.1 MB
941.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Intercurve.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 890.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 10.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.3 kB, which is 26% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 10.0 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Intercurve images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 173.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 173.1 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 8.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Intercurve.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 8.6 kB or 76% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (56%)
39
17
The browser has sent 39 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Intercurve. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
intercurve.com
248 ms
style.css
80 ms
ddsmoothmenu.css
146 ms
jquery.min.js
217 ms
ddsmoothmenu.js
145 ms
index.html
90 ms
logo.png
74 ms
site-map-icon.png
74 ms
emila-icon.png
74 ms
home-icon.png
149 ms
nav-mid-line.gif
144 ms
arrow1.png
145 ms
pink-circle.png
155 ms
services-title.gif
145 ms
services.jpg
205 ms
green-circle.png
212 ms
solutions-title.gif
229 ms
solutions.jpg
214 ms
red-cicle.png
228 ms
vertical-title.gif
223 ms
vertical.jpg
340 ms
blue-circle.png
283 ms
careers.gif
282 ms
carrers.jpg
349 ms
about-inter.gif
295 ms
vision-mission.gif
293 ms
address.gif
380 ms
quick-enquiry.gif
346 ms
bookmark-icon.png
361 ms
twitter-icon.png
358 ms
facebook-icon.png
405 ms
cuprum-webfont.woff
492 ms
screen.css
374 ms
jquery-1.3.js
531 ms
jquery.cycle.all.js
396 ms
banner_1.jpg
235 ms
banner_2.jpg
453 ms
banner_3.jpg
289 ms
banner_4.jpg
297 ms
banner_5.jpg
359 ms
intercurve.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
intercurve.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
intercurve.com SEO score
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Intercurve.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Intercurve.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
intercurve.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Intercurve. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: