6 sec in total
580 ms
5 sec
435 ms
Click here to check amazing Interfix Group content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about interfixgroup.com
Complete refurbishment solutions from bespoke design through to professional installation for commercial, retail and school toilets and washrooms
Visit interfixgroup.comWe analyzed Interfixgroup.com page load time and found that the first response time was 580 ms and then it took 5.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
interfixgroup.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.3 s
3/100
10%
Value23.8 s
0/100
25%
Value13.3 s
2/100
10%
Value1,520 ms
13/100
30%
Value0.156
74/100
15%
Value22.0 s
1/100
10%
580 ms
356 ms
26 ms
268 ms
361 ms
Our browser made a total of 86 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (67 requests) were addressed to the original Interfixgroup.com, 3% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Interfixgroup.com.
Page size can be reduced by 141.3 kB (13%)
1.1 MB
938.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Interfixgroup.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 851.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 129.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 129.5 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 11.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Interfix Group images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 75 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 63 (84%)
75
12
The browser has sent 75 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Interfix Group. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 40 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 25 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.interfixgroup.com
580 ms
style.min.css
356 ms
css
26 ms
cookie-law-info-public.css
268 ms
cookie-law-info-gdpr.css
361 ms
js_composer.min.css
715 ms
ave-core.min.css
270 ms
liquid-icon.min.css
449 ms
font-awesome.min.css
446 ms
bootstrap.min.css
536 ms
jquery-ui.css
443 ms
flickity.min.css
448 ms
fresco.css
533 ms
lity.min.css
535 ms
style.css
540 ms
theme.min.css
1070 ms
sweetalert2.min.css
622 ms
OverlayScrollbars.min.css
624 ms
stylesFull.css
625 ms
scale-extreme.css
625 ms
light.css
711 ms
liquid-responsive-100.css
802 ms
jquery.min.js
805 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
731 ms
cookie-law-info-public.js
800 ms
script.min.js
804 ms
jquery-3.5.1.min.js
978 ms
sweetalert2.all.min.js
890 ms
jquery.overlayScrollbars.min.js
891 ms
popper.min.js
891 ms
tippy-bundle.umd.min.js
892 ms
EasePack.min.js
980 ms
gsap.min.js
1121 ms
app.js
980 ms
785229.js
39 ms
v4-shims.min.css
900 ms
all.min.css
1341 ms
animate.min.css
1055 ms
fresco.js
876 ms
lity.min.js
873 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
1069 ms
SplitText.min.js
1064 ms
vc-waypoints.min.js
982 ms
StackBlur.js
980 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
976 ms
packery-mode.pkgd.min.js
1063 ms
flickity.pkgd.min.js
978 ms
flickity-fade.min.js
982 ms
vivus.min.js
972 ms
bootstrap.min.js
978 ms
intersection-observer.js
895 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
936 ms
css2
13 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
960 ms
anime.min.js
934 ms
ScrollMagic.min.js
882 ms
fontfaceobserver.js
829 ms
lazyload.min.js
828 ms
tinycolor-min.js
864 ms
theme.min.js
935 ms
loader.js
1343 ms
lftracker_v1_3P1w24dWWrg7mY5n.js
294 ms
Screenshot-2020-09-25-at-12.23.09.png
528 ms
css-vars-ponyfill.min.js
1882 ms
192446049
396 ms
59ccbcb3e1855-tuc22.09.17248of399-scaled.jpg
408 ms
5afe99dcb419a-stnicholas30.04.18294of382.jpg
407 ms
543bccf2e0ea2-maxwoodmaxcamb-002551-1-scaled.jpg
725 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff
99 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff
133 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc-.woff
134 ms
liquid-icon.woff
634 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
386 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
304 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
303 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
386 ms
624945876-69e4ac34610e401f1b107246dcb84bde2278fb76aed3f060a820977dfc647455-d
87 ms
tr-rc.lfeeder.com
57 ms
gtm.js
83 ms
insight.min.js
45 ms
stat.js
48 ms
js
75 ms
analytics.js
23 ms
collect
35 ms
collect
209 ms
ga-audiences
29 ms
interfixgroup.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
interfixgroup.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
interfixgroup.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Interfixgroup.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Interfixgroup.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
interfixgroup.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Interfix Group. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: