547 ms in total
105 ms
246 ms
196 ms
Welcome to intergate.com homepage info - get ready to check Intergate best content right away, or after learning these important things about intergate.com
End User Services is a dial-up internet service provider with nationwide access in over 8,000 cities. With reliable and affordable connections, EUS is the clear choice for dial-up service so look no f...
Visit intergate.comWe analyzed Intergate.com page load time and found that the first response time was 105 ms and then it took 442 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster.
intergate.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.0 s
84/100
10%
Value2.1 s
96/100
25%
Value2.0 s
99/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.04
99/100
15%
Value2.0 s
99/100
10%
105 ms
34 ms
32 ms
39 ms
34 ms
Our browser made a total of 55 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Intergate.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (109 ms) belongs to the original domain Intergate.com.
Page size can be reduced by 22.7 kB (64%)
35.2 kB
12.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Intergate.com main page is 35.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 18.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 13.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 13.1 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 9.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Intergate needs image optimization as it can save up to 9.6 kB or 51% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (57%)
54
23
The browser has sent 54 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Intergate. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.
intergate.com
105 ms
background.gif
34 ms
spacer.gif
32 ms
igatedsl.gif
39 ms
index_01.gif
34 ms
index_02.gif
37 ms
index_03.gif
35 ms
index_04.gif
34 ms
index_05.gif
35 ms
revised_27.gif
46 ms
StandardSignup.gif
58 ms
AnnualSignup.gif
58 ms
revised_06.gif
38 ms
revised_07.gif
60 ms
revised_24.gif
31 ms
revised_11.gif
32 ms
revised_12.gif
53 ms
revised_14.gif
39 ms
revised_33.gif
43 ms
revised_19.gif
48 ms
revised_20.gif
49 ms
revised_21.gif
49 ms
revised_22.gif
62 ms
revised_23.gif
51 ms
revised_36.gif
58 ms
revised_25.gif
56 ms
revised_26.gif
57 ms
revised_42.gif
71 ms
revised_28.gif
58 ms
HiSpeed01.gif
65 ms
HiSpeed02.gif
66 ms
revised_31.gif
65 ms
revised_32.gif
67 ms
revised_45.gif
81 ms
revised_34.gif
73 ms
revised_35.gif
73 ms
revised_48.gif
71 ms
revised_37.gif
71 ms
revised_38.gif
109 ms
revised_39.png
77 ms
revised_40.gif
76 ms
revised_41.gif
77 ms
revised_43.gif
79 ms
revised_44.gif
97 ms
revised_46.gif
83 ms
revised_47.gif
80 ms
revised_49.gif
75 ms
revised_50.gif
75 ms
revised_51.gif
79 ms
revised_52.gif
72 ms
revised_53.gif
74 ms
revised_54.gif
75 ms
revised_55.gif
79 ms
revised_56.gif
79 ms
revised_57.gif
84 ms
intergate.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
intergate.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
intergate.com SEO score
EN
EN
WINDOWS-1252
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Intergate.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Intergate.com main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1252. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
intergate.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Intergate. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: