2.9 sec in total
740 ms
1.7 sec
442 ms
Welcome to intergate.info homepage info - get ready to check Intergate best content for Japan right away, or after learning these important things about intergate.info
世の中の?や!に迫る情報メディア
Visit intergate.infoWe analyzed Intergate.info page load time and found that the first response time was 740 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
intergate.info performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.6 s
33/100
10%
Value7.9 s
3/100
25%
Value13.3 s
2/100
10%
Value5,590 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.147
76/100
15%
Value23.5 s
1/100
10%
740 ms
23 ms
8 ms
9 ms
40 ms
Our browser made a total of 65 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 12% of them (8 requests) were addressed to the original Intergate.info, 17% (11 requests) were made to I2.wp.com and 12% (8 requests) were made to I0.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (740 ms) belongs to the original domain Intergate.info.
Page size can be reduced by 186.7 kB (33%)
568.2 kB
381.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Intergate.info main page is 568.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 232.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 33.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 33.5 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 81 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Intergate images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 64.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 64.2 kB or 38% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 88.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Intergate.info needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 88.9 kB or 74% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (34%)
61
40
The browser has sent 61 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Intergate. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
intergate.info
740 ms
autoptimize_ece01e484b3f8c4dd163236b587bdfc5.css
23 ms
autoptimize_7de344172616f4a4e0b78fb58bb74722.css
8 ms
font-awesome.css
9 ms
jquery.min.js
40 ms
loader.js
131 ms
adsbygoogle.js
8 ms
analytics.js
74 ms
686e3cfb1216c6b2356ce98e6b5fa4d0.jpg
61 ms
0005dd8da44ad986ffa87b8a40858a56.jpg
60 ms
b23eb96503e0950e3a84c13b0b61da8b.jpg
66 ms
9ff77905b050dded1819d5692049443b.jpg
58 ms
kan4.jpg
64 ms
69e5c8d68a7c2e58554d0a8231a34e4a.jpg
61 ms
ee8205d9640136c8ee406332d105acb1.jpg
60 ms
5576b0538e59e5f5c6020fc082a94470.png
62 ms
Original_transparent_233x75_e_e1.png.pagespeed.ce.B8qUzw_vHj.png
61 ms
ca-pub-2875079662147139.js
154 ms
zrt_lookup.html
147 ms
show_ads_impl.js
147 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
39 ms
collect
197 ms
d60369ed04d1fb4c6ee7b1f5a1644598.jpg
162 ms
434d087c9174138776d8a979fdaa110f.jpg
161 ms
brand
158 ms
banner.blog.with2.net
690 ms
0000825409.jpg
473 ms
0cc08ecea29b2ed545d0ed5a45bf9e12.jpg
143 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
155 ms
e-201609.js
153 ms
autoptimize_79a0d6fcfd105bc2e7e7e5717c4c3df2.js.pagespeed.jm.Tg0AWHFvMn.js
370 ms
a54e5a6b37131ceffc38faff610c2eab.jpg
140 ms
4fb0dc3391ff15c0e39ed20dec36ddcd.jpg
135 ms
780433c30d9337dee9f92f6b6374f413.jpg
134 ms
80707d3d2e033e345dac01ff1f7a0c71.jpg
139 ms
23f749341f98b8c80c264cd451211a64.jpeg
150 ms
59352e88839a9cba3fd5c75810ed97f7.jpg
138 ms
834c2085edc3c70fd087fd3ba4e7e733.jpeg
139 ms
60e1ebd13a6f1d74a865381a0629bc56.jpg
131 ms
a03a18be6b9a9bbe17f77d71d633eeff.jpg
136 ms
5d59bcf7e4076cb65c5920533679671e.jpg
147 ms
wpspin-2x.gif.pagespeed.ce.fe8zqtlZzS.gif
146 ms
ads
286 ms
osd.js
14 ms
brand
84 ms
ads
271 ms
ads
208 ms
google_custom_search_watermark.gif
55 ms
g.gif
7 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
399 ms
sdk.js
240 ms
m_js_controller.js
34 ms
abg.js
62 ms
favicon
107 ms
favicon
152 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
142 ms
nessie_icon_thin_arrow_big_white.png
75 ms
imgad
78 ms
s
58 ms
x_button_blue2.png
22 ms
MdyApZkAHG2-UELdOwjNjjFZXSz-CGj4o1JtDR7aGgs.js
4 ms
152 ms
xd_arbiter.php
144 ms
xd_arbiter.php
265 ms
ui
13 ms
intergate.info accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
intergate.info best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
intergate.info SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
JA
JA
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Intergate.info can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Japanese is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Intergate.info main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
intergate.info
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Intergate. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: