14.4 sec in total
1 sec
5 sec
8.4 sec
Welcome to intergic.com homepage info - get ready to check Intergic best content right away, or after learning these important things about intergic.com
Strumenti digitali per l'innovazione in campo UX e CRO, payment e Ad Tech Optimization. La semplicità è complessità risolta.
Visit intergic.comWe analyzed Intergic.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1 sec and then it took 13.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
intergic.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.2 s
42/100
10%
Value3.7 s
57/100
25%
Value5.0 s
64/100
10%
Value670 ms
44/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value6.8 s
56/100
10%
1041 ms
976 ms
278 ms
270 ms
553 ms
Our browser made a total of 83 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (76 requests) were addressed to the original Intergic.com, 7% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) relates to the external source Fonts.gstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 226.8 kB (32%)
701.1 kB
474.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Intergic.com main page is 701.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 439.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 221.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 221.4 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Intergic images are well optimized though.
Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (49%)
73
37
The browser has sent 73 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Intergic. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 37 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
intergic.com
1041 ms
74f3e19d9da48863a9e742939a0f16a7.css
976 ms
jquery.min.js
278 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
270 ms
htmegamenu-main.js
553 ms
v4-shims.min.js
288 ms
css
160 ms
n2.min.js
212 ms
smartslider-frontend.min.js
373 ms
ss-simple.min.js
280 ms
w-arrow-image.min.js
320 ms
w-bullet.min.js
320 ms
frontend.min.js
362 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
363 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
374 ms
index.js
489 ms
front.min.js
420 ms
cb70d11b8.min.js
500 ms
popper.min.js
418 ms
htbbootstrap.js
521 ms
waypoints.js
566 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
460 ms
masonry.min.js
461 ms
htbuilder.js
577 ms
frontend-script.js
587 ms
widget-scripts.js
797 ms
wp-embed.min.js
462 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
468 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
508 ms
waypoints.min.js
507 ms
core.min.js
551 ms
swiper.min.js
648 ms
share-link.min.js
549 ms
dialog.min.js
558 ms
frontend.min.js
702 ms
animate-circle.js
602 ms
elementor.js
665 ms
preloaded-modules.min.js
610 ms
lazyload.min.js
481 ms
wsm_new.js
774 ms
9167CentraNo2-Medium.woff
853 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf
188 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf
1211 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
1217 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
1213 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf
1217 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf
1218 ms
eicons.woff
846 ms
eicons.woff
1199 ms
intergic-logo-200x57.png
402 ms
PUPPET-TALK-pi9xxdo4uae7hbkj28bkhjpcp8xwhkqunh8yqpmku8.png
395 ms
PUPPET-TALK.png
400 ms
homepage_arrow_new1_with_text_v2-300x251.png
428 ms
homepage_arrow_new_2_pos_2_new-300x251.png
400 ms
homepage_arrow_new1_with_text_pos_3-300x251.png
427 ms
homepage_arrow_new_2_pos_4_v2-300x251.png
464 ms
kameleoon_logo_transparent.png
390 ms
fact-finder-transparent.png
481 ms
prudsys_logo_transparent.png
400 ms
crobrain_logo_transparent.png
425 ms
mysize_logo_transparent.png
390 ms
klarna_logo_transparent_small.png
392 ms
shopreme_logo.svg
400 ms
Ekata-Logo.png
423 ms
Cofidis_logo.png
463 ms
gladcloud-logo-300x120-1.png
466 ms
worldz_logo_trasparente.png
475 ms
Keros_logo_small.png
476 ms
Struct_logo.png
475 ms
PUPPET-PHONE-pi9xxjazqr9dkvgmiq3qxutji1kvaktwfvb0tqzke8.png
807 ms
PUPPET-PHONE.png
463 ms
mediaworld.png
462 ms
nencini-sport-logo-homepage.png
476 ms
bricocenter-logo-homepage.png
477 ms
hoepli_logo_homepage.png
477 ms
euronics.png
499 ms
moncler-logo-homepage-2.png
801 ms
crai.png
802 ms
sportler_logo_2.png
801 ms
profumeriaweb.png
784 ms
holyart_logo_homepage.png
785 ms
zenick-logo-homepage.png
787 ms
intergic-logo-200x57-1.png
798 ms
intergic.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA IDs are not unique
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
intergic.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
intergic.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
IT
IT
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Intergic.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Italian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Intergic.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
intergic.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Intergic. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: